男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Reality proves naysayers wrong

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-05-05 09:11
Share
Share - WeChat

Former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten and the special administrative region's opposition figures Martin Lee Chu-ming, Joshua Wong Chi-fung and Lam Wing-kee gave "testimonies" on Wednesday at a hearing of the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China in relation to the status quo of "One Country, Two Systems" on the eve of the SAR's 20th anniversary. The foursome's conclusion was that "One Country, Two Systems" had drastically degenerated, and the US must put pressure on Beijing to "safeguard Hong Kong people's political freedom".

The commission is an agency which has regularly interfered in China's domestic affairs in the name of upholding the principles of human rights and democracy. Any fair-minded person can see the commission does not have any right whatsoever to comment on the implementation of the "One Country, Two Systems" principle in Hong Kong or how democracy has progressed in the city. That is absolutely the internal affair of China.

If the US really wishes "One Country, Two Systems" well - which it doesn't (and which is none of its business anyway) - it is ironic that those the US invited to the hearing were the very people who have done serious harm to this innovative and pragmatic arrangement.

Patten, while serving as the last governor of Hong Kong, breached the previous agreements between Beijing and London and introduced a series of "reforms" that consequently disrupted the smooth political transition to the first SAR government. Lee led the opposition camp into a staunch anti-mainland stance and kept inviting foreign intervention in our internal affairs. Wong has tried to stir up the young generation against Beijing and has apparently become "Martin Lee 2.0" with the support of foreign forces pulling strings behind the scenes. Lam overstepped the fine line between the "Two Systems" by selling illegal books into the mainland.

These people represent the forces in Hong Kong and beyond that want "One Country, Two Systems" to fail.

To their disappointment and contrary to their allegations, "One Country, Two Systems" has been doing just great. Under the protection of this arrangement and the Basic Law, the city has been able to preserve its social and economic fabric and original way of life in the past two decades. Hong Kong people have enjoyed unparalleled levels of freedom, democracy and human rights not known in colonial days.

The practice of "One Country, Two Systems" in Hong Kong is certainly not perfect but there are myriads of channels and platforms - official and unofficial - through which suggestions for improvement could be heard here. Bad-mouthing the SAR and central governments in front of foreign audiences with an unfriendly agenda will do only harm and no good to us. Inviting foreign forces to intervene is just ridiculous.

(HK Edition 05/05/2017 page1)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 奉化市| 璧山县| 本溪市| 红原县| 吴忠市| 白城市| 眉山市| 介休市| 伊春市| 客服| 湘阴县| 黎川县| 新宾| 文化| 宁波市| 柳林县| 乡宁县| 余姚市| 阳朔县| 酒泉市| 天峨县| 宣汉县| 迁安市| 深州市| 且末县| 东兴市| 冷水江市| 天长市| 云龙县| 呼和浩特市| 利津县| 蒲城县| 图木舒克市| 施秉县| 青神县| 屏东市| 平江县| 喜德县| 濮阳市| 桂阳县| 建湖县| 海宁市| 库车县| 闽侯县| 桐城市| 额尔古纳市| 白河县| 锡林郭勒盟| 屯留县| 绥化市| 康马县| 喀喇| 小金县| 呼和浩特市| 黔江区| 洪江市| 嘉禾县| 银川市| 临汾市| 手游| 丘北县| 罗定市| 新平| 曲水县| 夏河县| 宁德市| 贵州省| 南宁市| 霍州市| 惠来县| 民县| 寻乌县| 清水河县| 五峰| 仁寿县| 华阴市| 柳江县| 长宁区| 沂水县| 怀柔区| 东台市| 丽江市|