男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Involving stakeholders key to Afghan peace talks

By Hujjatullah Zia | China Daily | Updated: 2018-08-20 07:50
Share
Share - WeChat

The recent talks between the United States and the Taliban, the first of its kind, in Qatar broke many a stalemate. But the Taliban has intensified their attacks against the Afghan government in total disregard to the outcome of the talks.

The first ever talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban were held on July 7, 2015, in Murree near Islamabad under the supervision of US, Pakistani and Chinese representatives. However, no progress has been made.

To persuade the Taliban to agree to the second round of peace talks with the Afghan government, which were stalled after Taliban leader Mullah Omar's death, the Quadrilateral Coordination Group comprising Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and the US was established in December 2015. But it could not break the stalemate. Worse, the QCG suffered a blow owing to the mistrust between Pakistan and the US after US drones targeted Omar's successor Mullah Mansour in Baluchistan, Pakistan, which Islamabad said was a violation of its territorial integrity.

But even if the Taliban attend the peace talks, it does not necessarily mean they will eschew violence, because despite agreeing to negotiations, the Taliban have intensified their attacks against the Afghan government, indicating they never come to the table with bona fide intentions. Which means the Taliban consider the peace process as a political game, and use it to push their own agenda forward. For instance a handful of the Taliban prisoners were released from Afghan prisons based on an agreement but they returned to the "battlefields". The Taliban also assassinated Burhanuddin Rabbani, the head of Afghan High Peace Council, in 2011.

The recent talks between the US and the Taliban representatives are unlikely to yield results for two reasons: First, one-on-one talks cannot be productive when it comes to the US and the Taliban. The stakeholders and Afghanistan's allies will have to support an Afghanistan-led peace process, and the parties have to stop downplaying the role of Afghanistan's neighbors in this regard. The fact is that Pakistan and China carry much more weight in peace negotiations and their absence, as well as that of Afghanistan, from the US-Taliban talks in Qatar was strongly felt. Russia, too, seeks to play a role in the process.

Second, peace talks have split the Taliban in the past and some of their leaders who pursued talks have been assassinated. With this in mind, a peace agreement between "Qatari Taliban" and the US, if it ever happens, will divide the Taliban into factions.

Rejecting Kabul's olive branch, radical Taliban leader Mullah Haibatullah has constantly followed the policy of hit-and-run to consolidate his power, especially among those mercenaries who only know how to pull the trigger. Thus the talks have failed to yield a unanimous nod, let alone an agreement, from the Taliban leadership.

To bring the Taliban to the table, all stakeholders have to play a constructive role without downplaying one another. As such, Afghanistan's allies and regional powers, including China, Pakistan, Iran and Russia, should form a multilateral peace council to resolve the conflict through negotiations.

Political rivalries between regional powers have prevented the formation of a council to restore peace in Afghanistan. And the blame game between Kabul and Islamabad, combined with the trust deficit between the US and Russia, and the US and Iran, has prompted them to pursue talks on their own, which has led to nowhere.

However, the tense relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have eased thanks to China's efforts such as the hosting of the first China-Afghanistan-Pakistan Foreign Ministers' Dialogue on Dec 26, 2017, to strengthen mutual trust between Kabul and Islamabad.

Nonetheless, relations between Iran and Russia on the one hand and the US on the other have worsened after the US pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal and re-imposed sanctions on Iran and due to volatile relations between Washington and Moscow. In such a case, not only Afghanistan's security but also regional security faces a threat.

Despite the ongoing peace process and frequent peace offers by the Afghan government to the Taliban, insurgency has not subsided, and the strong sense of fear and disappointment across Afghanistan has left little room for talks. Therefore, Afghanistan and its international allies must strike a strong military deal to counter the Taliban if the latter resist returning to the negotiation table.

The author is a columnist for Daily Outlook, an independent newspaper in Afghanistan.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 尉犁县| 广饶县| 正安县| 金昌市| 岳池县| 丽水市| 响水县| 鹤峰县| 肇州县| 金沙县| 江陵县| 汶上县| 九江县| 黄陵县| 沂水县| 察哈| 桂阳县| 邮箱| 汤阴县| 威远县| 轮台县| 扶余县| 张家口市| 吉隆县| 汾西县| 皮山县| 汉源县| 嵊州市| 金平| 科尔| 商南县| 鲜城| 鄂托克前旗| 富民县| 梨树县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 岳阳县| 彝良县| 咸丰县| 克东县| 乳源| 合阳县| 太保市| 天峻县| 绵阳市| 通江县| 马山县| 万载县| 大兴区| 枣强县| 博爱县| 寻乌县| 辉县市| 房产| 长子县| 贵州省| 固原市| 华亭县| 荔浦县| 酉阳| 左云县| 白水县| 昔阳县| 凭祥市| 凤庆县| 舟曲县| 临夏市| 巴林左旗| 明水县| 北辰区| 迁安市| 阿荣旗| 苍南县| 四川省| 威信县| 漠河县| 平和县| 高台县| 凤山市| 平定县| 江油市| 余庆县|