男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

US automakers take big steps in quality survey

By LI FUSHENG | China Daily | Updated: 2020-06-29 10:16
Share
Share - WeChat
US carmaker GM presents its GMC truck at the 2nd China International Import Expo in 2019. [Photo/LI FUSHENG FOR CHINA DAILY]

Detroit-area automakers made their strongest showing ever in an annual survey of vehicle quality in the United States, as once-dominant Japanese brands faded.

The annual survey by JD Power also found that luxury brands performed below the industry average, often because they come equipped with more glitchy new electronics than mainstream brands.

Most Detroit-area brands outpaced the industry average in problems per 100 vehicles, with Fiat Chrysler's Dodge brand tying for first place with Kia of South Korea. It was the first time a Detroit brand finished first in the survey, now in its 34th year.

Five of the top 10 brands were from Detroit, with Chevrolet and Ram tied for third, followed by Genesis, Mitsubishi, Buick, GMC, Volkswagen and Hyundai. Dodge and Kia tied at 136 problems per 100 vehicles.

Land Rover ranked last with owners reporting 228 problems per 100 vehicles, followed by Audi, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz and Jaguar. Toyota, which traditionally ranks in the top 10, dropped below the industry average to 21st out of 32 brands included in the survey with 177 problems per 100 vehicles.

Detroit automakers benefited from a change in the study's methodology, which was updated this year to include more questions about new technology, said Doug Betts, president of JD Power's Automotive Division and a former quality chief for Fiat Chrysler.

The survey is redone every five years, and questions were added about features that didn't exist during the last update, he said. As a result, owners reported more problems within the first 90 days of owning 2020 models, raising the industry average from a record low 93 problems per 100 vehicles last year to 166 problems this year.

That doesn't mean quality is getting worse, Betts said. It just means that more questions were asked about newer features. Some questions, such as those about exterior rust or outside lights failing, were dropped from the survey because they don't happen very often anymore, he said.

Infotainment systems remained the most problematic category, accounting for almost one-quarter of all problems. The biggest owner complaints were about poor voice recognition systems or difficulty connecting vehicles to Android Auto or Apple CarPlay systems.

In the past, the survey found mechanical problems often plagued Detroit automakers. But over the years, the differences evened out with nearly all automakers performing well, Betts said.

That leaves the performance of new technology as the main factor differentiating between brands.

The Dodge brand, which for years has ranked low in quality, was aided by its relatively old model lineup, because engineers have had time to work out bugs, Betts said. The highest-ranked vehicle in the survey was the Chevrolet Sonic subcompact, with only 103 problems per 100 vehicles, largely because it's been produced for eight years and doesn't have many new electronic features, Betts said.

For the first time, the survey included a score for electric car maker Tesla, which had a very high 250 problems per 100 vehicles. Betts said the score can't be ranked against other brands because JD Power wasn't able to survey Tesla owners in all states.

In 15 states, JD Power needs a manufacturer's permission to survey owners, which Tesla refuses to allow, Betts said. So the score doesn't include states including California, where Tesla sells many of its vehicles, he said.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 荔浦县| 余江县| 贵阳市| 嘉禾县| 阳朔县| 射洪县| 河津市| 沈丘县| 喀什市| 库车县| 临泉县| 商南县| 乌拉特中旗| 青浦区| 含山县| 肃宁县| 嘉义县| 东乡族自治县| 南京市| 兴安盟| 婺源县| 双江| 兴宁市| 常宁市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 奈曼旗| 三原县| 内丘县| 上饶市| 道孚县| 辛集市| 库尔勒市| 秭归县| 营山县| 沈丘县| 樟树市| 渑池县| 页游| 兰西县| 嘉黎县| 栾川县| 仲巴县| 中西区| 登封市| 宝鸡市| 翁牛特旗| 霍州市| 辽阳市| 海原县| 龙州县| 乐山市| 阳高县| 茂名市| 辽宁省| 梅州市| 全州县| 新民市| 威信县| 南木林县| 广水市| 信阳市| 高唐县| 鸡东县| 依安县| 雷波县| 清镇市| 靖宇县| 桃园县| 嘉善县| 宁陕县| 盖州市| 龙口市| 安宁市| 通道| 原平市| 桦甸市| 祥云县| 和顺县| 琼中| 福泉市| 惠安县| 固安县|