男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Top court: Resolving intl disputes key

Steps bode well for promoting opening-up, judicial credibility, investment environment

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2024-03-11 07:19
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/VCG]

By offering equal protection to domestic as well as overseas litigants, Chinese courts have given full play to the role of mediation in solving commercial disputes. This has helped create a market-oriented and law-based first-class business environment, China's top court said.

In 2023, courts at all levels across China concluded 24,000 commercial cases involving foreign litigants, up 3.6 percent year-on-year, according to the annual work report of the Supreme People's Court.

The average time taken to solve such lawsuits has been reduced by nearly 10 days, said the report, which was submitted on Friday to the second session of the 14th National People's Congress, China's top legislature, for review.

"In the face of the increasing number of disputes, improving the professionalism and efficiency of case hearings is important, as it's related to promoting our high-quality opening-up, our judicial credibility and the investment environment of the market," the top court said.

Over the past few years, Chinese courts have stepped up efforts to improve their efficiency, with more international judiciary exchanges and optimized measures for foreign litigants.

In August 2018, for instance, the top court established an international commercial expert committee as a think tank for tackling foreign-related disputes.

So far, the committee has invited 61 experts from 24 countries and regions to participate, mainly to help solve international commercial cases through mediation and provide opinions in the identification and application of foreign laws, as well as in the studies of foreign-related judicial interpretations and policies.

While requiring every court to offer equal protection to all litigants, regardless of whether they are domestic or foreign, the top court has also encouraged judges to mediate between two sides, taking the mediation as a good remedy in resolving international commercial disputes.

In one case, an Indian national signed up for medical insurance with a Chinese company in 2020. He spent more than 60,000 yuan ($8,350) on surgery and medical treatment in February 2021, but when he turned to the company for compensation, he was turned down. He then sued the insurer in Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court.

During the trial, the court found that the source of the conflict between the litigants was the language barrier. When the insurance contract was signed, the company did not clearly introduce the content to the Indian in a language he could understand, causing him to receive medical treatment beyond the coverage of the policy.

Given the flaws on both sides and to equally protect their legitimate interests, the court organized communications between them, comforting the Indian litigant while urging the company to regulate its interpretation of insurance-related information to applicants.

The communication made the two sides understand each other. Thanks to the mediation of the court, the company eventually agreed to compensate the foreigner.

Furthermore, the court contacted the Beijing Insurance Association, asking it to optimize workflows of the industry and increase explanations of insurance content to customers to prevent similar disputes.

"This successful mediation is an example of contribution of judicial efforts to enhance the international influence of Chinese justice and facilitate the healthy development of China's insurance industry," the top court said.

In addition to efficiently solving international commercial cases to help build a sound business environment, the top court provided opportunities for exchanges among judicial officials from home and abroad last year.

For instance, it held the Maritime Silk Road International Forum on Judicial Cooperation in Quanzhou, Fujian province, and a forum for judges from Shanghai Cooperation Organization countries.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 呼玛县| 喀喇沁旗| 房产| 江门市| 绿春县| 茌平县| 来凤县| 封开县| 广宁县| 桑日县| 南澳县| 蒙自县| 秦安县| 克山县| 鄂托克前旗| 长泰县| 佛坪县| 吐鲁番市| 鞍山市| 寿光市| 唐河县| 筠连县| 吉首市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 嘉定区| 佛学| 西安市| 博客| 苍山县| 峨边| 揭东县| 饶阳县| 石台县| 西丰县| 本溪市| 麻栗坡县| 陵川县| 竹溪县| 佛冈县| 临夏县| 扬州市| 固阳县| 肇东市| 新田县| 长垣县| 通化县| 承德市| 英德市| 庆云县| 柘荣县| 六盘水市| 广丰县| 襄樊市| 象州县| 永昌县| 库尔勒市| 志丹县| 乐业县| 阿瓦提县| 黄陵县| 诸暨市| 乌审旗| 扬中市| 镇雄县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 林甸县| 五河县| 扶绥县| 贵阳市| 广西| 红桥区| 泽库县| 肥西县| 昌都县| 丁青县| 株洲县| 阿瓦提县| 惠安县| 大兴区| 崇信县| 承德县| 芦溪县|