男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

Tariffs bad for business, bad for US firms and consumers, and bad for all trading partners

China Daily | Updated: 2024-12-10 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

To those worrying about the uncertainties heralded by a new incoming United States administration and the president-elect's unpredictability, there is one thing at least that is predictable: He will continue wielding the baton of tariffs.

"I'm a big believer in tariffs. I think tariffs is the most beautiful word. I think they're beautiful," he told NBC in his latest interview. "It's going to make us rich."

Tariffs might be among the few things on which the former US president and now president-elect has aligned his words with deeds, and they may continue to serve as his foreign policy weapon of choice during his second stint in the White House.

Since he seems not to have become sufficiently aware of the negative impacts of the abusive use of tariffs on the United States during his first term, he may have a better chance to learn that this time around. Because as the accumulative effects of the tariffs he imposed in his first term and the subsequent ones that the Joe Biden administration has added show their actual weight on the US economy and US consumers, there is no way he will be left in the dark if he continues to rely on tariffs as a means to impose the US' will on other countries.

In fact, no assessment of the state of the US economy is credible without factoring in the role of tariffs. Any responsible analysis will find such excessive levying of tariffs to be against economic common sense, and potentially self-defeating. We have no clue as to how much the president-elect has been briefed about the current US administration's so-far unsuccessful struggle against inflation. But it certainly will be good for him and his country if he listens more broadly to what credible economists, the business community, and American consumers have to say.

At this point in time, the president-elect appears convinced those against his tariff strategy are overstating their concerns. On the campaign trail, he told US voters that tariffs would restore factory jobs, reduce government debt and allow his administration to subsidize childcare. As he said in the NBC interview, "They cost Americans nothing. They made a great economy for us". And, better still, he claimed to "have stopped wars with tariffs".

Yet asked whether he could guarantee that US consumers won't pay higher prices under those tariffs, he sounded less sure. He "doesn't believe" his tariffs will raise prices for families, but he hedged his bets by conceding, "I can't guarantee anything".

Of course he can't. But if he took a serious look at the actual consequences of the recent tariffs, he might think twice about the new ones he has proposed. There is ample evidence to let him see tariffs' nature as a "double-edged sword", which is particularly obvious in the trade war against China.

Trump's NBC interviewer, for one, reminded him that the tariffs he imposed during his first administration cost Americans $80 billion in additional sales taxes. As US figures indicate, as a result of the trade war, US agricultural income dropped by $27 billion in 2018 and 2019. Nor did tariffs on imported steel bring more jobs to US plants.

Protectionists love tariffs for their immediate effects in suppressing competitors. But there is always another side to the coin. When one levies higher taxes on producers, the latter will ask higher prices of the retailers who sell their products to offset the additional cost. And the retailers will then sell imported goods at higher prices to the end consumers to make up the price difference.

Multiple polls in the US have found the majority of Americans believe tariffs make domestic goods pricier. Economists generally project that cost to each American household is likely to be thousands of dollars a year.

The CEOs of such businesses as auto-parts company AutoZone, Columbia Sportswear, and Stanley Black& Decker, the world's largest tool company, have already decided to "pass those tariff costs back to the consumer", in AutoZone CEO's words, should the next administration enact the president-elect's tariff plan.

And large retail chains such as Target and Walmart are also expected to follow suit. After all, the planned tariffs will prove unaffordable to numerous retailers, large and small alike.

 

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 北流市| 承德市| 霍城县| 从化市| 旬邑县| 和龙市| 蒙山县| 新丰县| 涞源县| 上饶县| 金阳县| 泸州市| 隆林| 新乡市| 乌兰浩特市| 峨眉山市| 杂多县| 响水县| 于都县| 北辰区| 方正县| 洛南县| 上犹县| 云南省| 临颍县| 承德县| 茌平县| 芜湖市| 临沭县| 建水县| 连南| 屏边| 辽阳市| 镶黄旗| 延庆县| 南华县| 勐海县| 长泰县| 开远市| 平果县| 南昌县| 阿图什市| 德保县| 沾化县| 延川县| 嘉峪关市| 南川市| 科尔| 巴彦县| 客服| 岐山县| 海阳市| 闽侯县| 阿城市| 犍为县| 桃源县| 进贤县| 阿尔山市| 石阡县| 杭州市| 读书| 浑源县| 寿阳县| 司法| 景泰县| 阿瓦提县| 专栏| 叶城县| 鄂托克前旗| 尉氏县| 江都市| 新蔡县| 达拉特旗| 宜黄县| 焉耆| 大理市| 台江县| 永嘉县| 金阳县| 若羌县| 缙云县| 湾仔区|