男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

HK's swift response to Tai Po fire in stark contrast to Grenfell Tower blaze probe

By XING YI | China Daily | Updated: 2025-12-11 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

The tragedy of the Tai Po fire in Hong Kong, which claimed more than 150 lives, offers a point of reference for the United Kingdom. There the call for justice in another deadly fire remains unanswered after years of delay and a lengthy legal process.

On June 14, 2017, a fire fuelled by highly flammable cladding engulfed Grenfell Tower in London, killing 72 residents. In the aftermath, the then UK prime minister, Theresa May, launched a public inquiry to determine the facts behind the tragedy and prevent a similar disaster from happening again.

May said she was determined to ensure justice for all the victims and insisted that "we cannot wait for ages" to learn the lessons. Yet nearly a decade later, many of those pledges remain unfulfilled. The bereaved families left waiting are increasingly angry and frustrated.

Despite a 1,700-page report finally being published in September 2024, no one has yet been arrested, prosecuted or held accountable. Though the UK's Crown Prosecution Service said it has been working closely with the Metropolitan Police Service, it will not take a decision on who to charge for the fire before the end of 2026.

According to a report in The Guardian, survivors of the Grenfell fire have condemned the lack of accountability as "a deep and bitter injustice", noting that many of the officials criticized in the inquiry continue to work in related fields.

This prolonged process has eroded public trust and made many feel that the inquiry has become more a mechanism for managing public anger than actually delivering justice. At this year's anniversary of the tragedy, the vice-chairman of Grenfell United, representing the survivors of the tragedy and bereaved families, branded the disaster a "forgotten scandal".

The contrast between the required urgency and the sluggish pace of the work offers an important lesson for Hong Kong. While the circumstances differ, the societal imperative is the same: swift, transparent and uncompromising accountability.

This is why Hong Kong's response to the Tai Po fire is worth mentioning.

First, the Hong Kong Fire Services Department, together with law enforcement agencies, moved quickly to investigate the cause of the fire, and 13 people have already been arrested for suspected manslaughter.

Second, Hong Kong's Independent Commission Against Corruption has set up a task force to probe possible corruption in the grand renovation project of Wang Fuk Court, detaining 12 individuals, including consultants, subcontractors and middlemen.

Third, John Lee Ka-chiu, chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, announced last week that he will invite a judge to lead an independent committee tasked with conducting a comprehensive review of the building works system and recommending reforms to prevent similar tragedies.

"Yes, we need a reform. Yes, we have identified failures at different stages," Lee said at a news conference. "That is exactly why we must act seriously to ensure that all these loopholes are plugged, so that those who are responsible will be accountable and the shortcomings will be addressed."

Without doubt those responsible for manslaughter or corruption will not be spared. With major renovation works currently underway in many residential buildings across Hong Kong, people are relieved to see the SAR government making devoted efforts to find out what happened and what needs to be improved.

It is imperative that the independent committee identify, as quickly as possible, the systemic causes behind the fire and press the government to implement reforms without delay.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 新沂市| 长海县| 康保县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 洞头县| 通城县| 通渭县| 长宁县| 东至县| 永昌县| 运城市| 朝阳县| 昭通市| 鄂托克前旗| 托克逊县| 许昌县| 辽阳县| 宽甸| 凉城县| 通州市| 毕节市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 犍为县| 尼木县| 昌江| 邓州市| 奇台县| 滦南县| 玉山县| 科技| 玉田县| 繁峙县| 静海县| 安宁市| 西安市| 广丰县| 宝兴县| 连州市| 木兰县| 泾源县| 蒲江县| 壶关县| 牟定县| 瑞昌市| 叶城县| 梁河县| 丹江口市| 淄博市| 渭南市| 大新县| 德州市| 临颍县| 潼南县| 临沂市| 运城市| 隆子县| 海安县| 渭南市| 大新县| 黄大仙区| 嘉祥县| 合江县| 缙云县| 彰化县| 芜湖市| 佳木斯市| 淮滨县| 达尔| 隆德县| 军事| 迭部县| 芜湖县| 潢川县| 喀喇沁旗| 东乡族自治县| 台湾省| 莫力| 洪泽县| 孟津县| 九江县| 昭觉县| 区。|