男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Shoemakers to suffer EU anti-dumping hit

By Diao Ying (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-12-19 09:49

The vast majority of Chinese footwear manufacturers will most likely not file suit against an anti-dumping tariff from the European Union as the deadline for litigation draws near, partly due to what would be expensive, lengthy legal battles.

Related readings:
 Trade: Europe deficit with China hits new high
 Firms prepare for EU rules on chemical goods imports
 China economy status deal might help EU
 Ministry of Commerce backs shoemakers' EU lawsuits

The European Union has imposed a 16.5 per cent anti-dumping tariff on leather shoes imported from China since October 7. Over 1,200 shoemakers were effected, though only four are fighting back through lawsuits in the EU courts.

Two of these firms are Zhejiang-based enterprises, including Aokang Group, the largest privately owned footwear manufacturer, and Taima Shoes Group, the third-largest shoe firm in the province. They are joined by two Guangdong-based companies: Golden Step Industrial Co Ltd and Xinsheng Gangyuan Shoes Group.

Guo Weiwen, an official with another Guangdong-based company, Apach Footwear, said that most small- and medium-sized enterprises are trying to work around the tariffs.

"Most enterprises turn to other strategies such as adjusting product structure and changing their export market," she said. "Some of them even plan to recede from the EU market."

Wang Xuehua, a lawyer specializing in anti-dumping with the Beijing Huanzhong Law Firm said that the high cost, complicated legal procedures, and unpredictable result of suing has stopped most enterprises from filing.

The legal procedure to counter anti-dumping charges can be very time consuming, and "it is possible that the two-year period will come to an end before the investigation is completed," said Wei Yafei, a spokeswoman with the China Leather Industry Association.

The four bigger players that are suing, however, feel they have a case.

"The European Union's action does not follow the rules of the World Trade Organization and the convention of the industry," said Liao Yue, chairman of Taima, one of the companies taking legal action. "They imposed tariffs on us without investigating my company."

The two Guangdong enterprises that decided to file the suit, according to Guo of Apach, were "the sample enterprises chosen by the European Union during the investigation, so they have experience in dealing with legal issues."

Shoemaker Aokang said it already handed its litigation materials to the European court in Brussels and are waiting for reaction.

"We hope we can learn something from this case, and we need to gain some experience for other enterprises in the future," said Wei Kaimeng, a spokesman with Aokang.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



主站蜘蛛池模板: 开阳县| 文安县| 隆安县| 潞城市| 芒康县| 安西县| 桦南县| 永川市| 固镇县| 松溪县| 石城县| 舟山市| 镇远县| 马关县| 承德市| 瓦房店市| 洪雅县| 资源县| 常山县| 盐城市| 仙游县| 绥阳县| 梁河县| 襄垣县| 姚安县| 天镇县| 湖州市| 陵川县| 扎鲁特旗| 荣成市| 宁乡县| 花垣县| 永修县| 山东| 武功县| 宜都市| 巧家县| 武胜县| 金沙县| 康保县| 镇巴县| 静安区| 格尔木市| 定襄县| 石狮市| 百色市| 尼木县| 双辽市| 习水县| 浦县| 天津市| 芒康县| 沁阳市| 德清县| 犍为县| 油尖旺区| 当阳市| 定远县| 彩票| 西青区| 延寿县| 余江县| 凤凰县| 海门市| 平阳县| 通州市| 和平区| 临泽县| 蒲城县| 九江县| 油尖旺区| 黔江区| 行唐县| 蚌埠市| 连州市| 辽宁省| 桂东县| 沙坪坝区| 和静县| 固原市| 布拖县| 炎陵县|