|
BIZCHINA> Editor Choice
![]() |
|
Related
Ambush marketing hurting sponsors
By Liu Jie (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-07-10 18:24
According to the report, global market and research firm The Nielsen Company exclusively offered for China Daily, the majority of Chinese consumers, or 73 percent of the respondents, would be more likely to purchase or use a brand if it was an Olympic sponsor. "The good news for official sponsors is that in spite of there being more than 60 of them battling it out, along with a host of competitor campaigns, some sponsors have been successful in cutting through the advertising clutter to establish their Olympic connection in the minds of consumers," said Richard Basil-Jones, managing director of Media Asia-Pacific of The Nielsen Company. The company gauged the consumer perception of Olympic sponsors and competitor brand endorsement, advertising and creative strategies in an online survey, conducted between May 19 and 25. It surveyed a total of 12,549 and is a representative of the Chinese population. When consumers were asked to identify which brands were Olympic sponsors from a list of both sponsor and non-sponsor brands, a high level of consumers chose China Mobile, Lenovo and Coca-Cola. 82 percent of those surveyed recognized that China Mobile was an official sponsor, 67 percent identified Lenovo and 63 percent pointed to Coca-Cola. At the same time, non-sponsors have not been slow to get in on the act, incorporating sports-related themes or athletes in their advertising, designed to establish a connection between their brands and the Games. Non-sponsor Nike - competitor to official sponsor Adidas - has taken advantage of arguably the most famous Chinese athlete, hurdler Liu Xiang, for its advertising, while Liu Xiang appears concurrently in advertising for sponsors Coca-Cola, Visa, Lenovo, Haier and Yili. "The Nielsen survey found that non-sponsor activity is succeeding in creating some confusion in the minds of consumers, and while Yili, with 57 percent awareness, appears to be heading off non-sponsor Mengniu, at 37 percent awareness. Adidas faces a significant challenge from non-sponsor Li Ning, with identifying rates of the two at 34 percent and 29 percent respectively," said Basil-Jones. Besides Li Ning, competitor brands receiving the most incorrect Olympic associations were China Unicom and Pepsi, with 25 percent and 18 percent awareness respectively, although levels of association were far below that of the sponsors in their respective product categories. Worldwide Olympic partnerships are also no guarantee of consumer recognition in the Chinese market, with awareness for Visa, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald's and Samsung all registering at around the quarter to one-third marks. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 镇雄县| 兴山县| 达州市| 新丰县| 舒城县| 金堂县| 磐安县| 县级市| 淅川县| 崇义县| 噶尔县| 烟台市| 汉寿县| 马公市| 南溪县| 太原市| 方正县| 大新县| 外汇| 穆棱市| 黎川县| 金门县| 辽阳市| 聂荣县| 德兴市| 兴海县| 东海县| 广昌县| 广德县| 中山市| 阿拉善左旗| 盘锦市| 弥勒县| 奎屯市| 砀山县| 繁昌县| 民和| 曲松县| 武乡县| 财经| 堆龙德庆县| 青海省| 新安县| 青海省| 安丘市| 岳普湖县| 施秉县| 门源| 沂源县| 布尔津县| 平乐县| 新丰县| 依安县| 响水县| 廉江市| 翼城县| 盐边县| 怀远县| 湖州市| 彰化市| 黑水县| 姜堰市| 阳朔县| 专栏| 邢台县| 南乐县| 荥阳市| 灵山县| 永川市| 健康| 冕宁县| 玛纳斯县| 罗城| 泰来县| 溧阳市| 师宗县| 呼玛县| 科技| 象山县| 荔波县| 洛南县| 尚义县|