男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
BIZCHINA> Center
Danone to fight on after verdict
By Tuo Yannan (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-08-06 08:55

Danone to fight on after verdict

In response to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court ruling in favor of Wahaha's right to its trademark, Danone Group yesterday said it will pursue all legal options to protect its contractual rights and financial interests.

Wahaha spokesman Shan Qining said: "What we want to say to Danone's statement is only one sentence: 'We respect the decision of the court and we respect the law.'"

Hangzhou-based Wahaha Group had earlier said the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court had rejected Danone's appeal of Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling in favor of Wahaha in a dispute over the ownership of the Wahaha trademark.

The Wahaha spokesman said the ruling was a key development in its prolonged dispute with its French partner, and should have a positive impact on another dispute that is now before an arbitration commission.

Danone Group argued that the Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling had "distorted the facts of the case, intentionally and maliciously misinterpreted and misapplied the laws of the People's Republic of China, and was an award that completely ignored the facts and law".

Danone had also said it hoped the Hangzhou court would carry out the substantive review, apart from the procedural review, of the legality of the arbitral procedures.

In its latest statement, Danone said: "The Hangzhou court only carried out a procedural review for this case (specifically, the Hangzhou court failed to conduct a substantive review of the accuracy and legality of the determination of facts and application of law) and rendered its ruling based on a procedural review only."

Although the Hangzhou court ruling is final, Danone said it would report the matter to the appropriate superior judicial authorities in China. It also said the arbitration proceedings in Stockholm would begin hearing in January.

Last year, Danone filed its first lawsuit against Wahaha on May 9 in Stockholm, and on June 4, Danone filed another lawsuit in Los Angeles against two Wahaha-related companies and two individuals.

Since 2006, the two companies have filed numerous complaints and lawsuits against each other under various Chinese and foreign jurisdictions.

Danone, which owns a 51 percent stake in 39 Danone-Wahaha joint ventures, has accused Wahaha of setting up independent companies and selling products identical to those sold by the joint ventures. Danone had demanded a 51 percent stake in the non-joint-venture companies, which Wahaha rejected.

 


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 志丹县| 临沂市| 万州区| 霍林郭勒市| 锦州市| 牟定县| 贵港市| 五华县| 佛冈县| 威海市| 寿宁县| 佳木斯市| 隆林| 郁南县| 长子县| 浦城县| 沅陵县| 桂林市| 都昌县| 龙游县| 保德县| 白河县| 天峨县| 榆树市| 尉氏县| 新竹县| 开江县| 科技| 蒙阴县| 新建县| 洪雅县| 鹿邑县| 屏山县| 永定县| 阳城县| 竹溪县| 舒城县| 韩城市| 阳春市| 高阳县| 湘潭县| 乌恰县| 青浦区| 宣武区| 南京市| 栾川县| 溆浦县| 衢州市| 咸宁市| 南阳市| 崇明县| 平塘县| 安溪县| 集贤县| 贵德县| 利津县| 称多县| 苏州市| 临颍县| 徐水县| 棋牌| 翁牛特旗| 金湖县| 柘荣县| 舒兰市| 祁门县| 河西区| 彝良县| 临沧市| 濮阳县| 乐亭县| 武山县| 洮南市| 醴陵市| 贡山| 民权县| 江孜县| 闻喜县| 阳春市| 普宁市| 昭觉县| 留坝县|