男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Markets

Offshore debt markets open up new financing channels

By Zheng Yangpeng (China Daily) Updated: 2015-06-17 08:08

Offshore debt markets are fast emerging as alternative financing channels for local government financing vehicles and infrastructure companies.

Till date, at least five mainland-based LGFVs and infrastructure companies have sold a combined $3 billion worth of bonds in overseas markets. Four of these are first-time issuers, information compiled by China Daily showed.

The latest sale was by Anhui Transportation Holding Group Co, which made its debut on dollar bond market on June 4 by selling $300 million notes.

The company, a wholly owned provincial State-owned enterprise which builds and operates toll roads and public transport for the hinterland province, sold the three-year notes at a coupon of 2.875 percent. The sale was underwritten by BNP Paribas and other leading banks. It was assigned a BBB+ rating by Fitch Ratings and an A3 rating by Moody's Investors Service.

"The ratings are credit-linked with Fitch's internal credit assessment of Anhui province. The strong linkages are evident in the province's 100 percent ownership of the company...and the overall strong strategic importance of company's operations to the province," Fitch said in a statement.

Other issuers were also able to enjoy the support from their directly linked governments, who deemed such companies as strategically important to the region's development, thus least likely to allow them to default. For example, Beijing Infrastructure Investment Co, a wholly owned SOE of the local government and the builder and operator of Beijing's sprawling subway network, sold three-year notes of 5 million euros with a 1 percent coupon this March, a record low borrowing cost so far among LGFVs.

By comparison, three-year domestically AAA-rated LGFVs bond were sold at a 4.2 percent average yield in the onshore market until Tuesday, according to Chinabond.com.

The bond was widely chased by yield-hungry institutional investors in the US and Europe, for its relatively high yield and low risk. When Guangzhou Communications Investment Group, a toll road and public transport company fully owned by the Guangzhou municipality, sold its $400 million notes in late May, bidding was 11.5 times of planned issuance. The enthusiasm has pushed the issuance price to 3 percent, 35 basis points down the guidance price.

Overseas investors have a very short time, usually one or two days, to decide their purchases after issuers staged road shows, routinely in Hong Kong, Singapore and London, a banker involved in such deals said on condition of anonymity.

Issuers so far are concentrated in a handful of provincial SOEs and LGFVs under municipalities with strong credit profiles, such as Beijing and Guangzhou. There are more than 10,000 LGFVs in China.

Ivan Chung, senior vice-president of Moody's Investors' Service, said: "Overseas investors are positive toward 'quality' LGFVs who come from wealthier regions. Issuers so far are weak in their standalone financial profiles so government support, including tax and dividend refund, and subsidies, became critical. It might be difficult for overseas investors to embrace LGFVs from lower and poorer authorities."

SOEs in China are still subjected to stringent approval by domestic regulators when it comes to offshore funding, and complications in repatriation of bond proceeds remain a major hurdle, analysts said. Unlike general SOEs that often have overseas business operations and hence can use the borrowed foreign currency locally, LGFVs are exclusively domestic-focused and hence need to come up with complicated ways to transfer the money inward.

These set-ups, along with moves taken to hedge the currency risk, may add costs and make overseas fundraising less appealing.

Terry Gao, a senior analyst with Fitch, said another critical problem for overseas investors is they are desperate to know more about the underlying assets behind these bonds. Lack of information disclosure has hampered informed decisions and the pricing mechanism.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 金堂县| 黄大仙区| 桃源县| 绿春县| 上犹县| 益阳市| 桓台县| 天水市| 额济纳旗| 凤凰县| 河曲县| 建阳市| 那坡县| 滦南县| 金阳县| 宝坻区| 荔浦县| 四子王旗| 扎鲁特旗| 康保县| 赤壁市| 定襄县| 赞皇县| 陆良县| 崇阳县| 方山县| 温宿县| 阿克| 荆门市| 淮安市| 鄄城县| 阳信县| 陆川县| 子洲县| 伊宁市| 旌德县| 东光县| 曲水县| 博兴县| 济南市| 南京市| 青川县| 淮滨县| 华坪县| 塔城市| 嘉兴市| 宕昌县| 综艺| 凤山市| 合水县| 神农架林区| 武乡县| 洛扎县| 邹平县| 民县| 津南区| 富顺县| 房山区| 兰考县| 黄龙县| 崇仁县| 出国| 农安县| 云龙县| 同仁县| 额敏县| 淮南市| 珲春市| 芦溪县| 吉林市| 牟定县| 闸北区| 游戏| 万盛区| 丰台区| 阳新县| 和田县| 林甸县| 万安县| 汶上县| 博乐市| 新巴尔虎右旗|