男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Markets

Offshore debt markets open up new financing channels

By Zheng Yangpeng (China Daily) Updated: 2015-06-17 08:08

Offshore debt markets are fast emerging as alternative financing channels for local government financing vehicles and infrastructure companies.

Till date, at least five mainland-based LGFVs and infrastructure companies have sold a combined $3 billion worth of bonds in overseas markets. Four of these are first-time issuers, information compiled by China Daily showed.

The latest sale was by Anhui Transportation Holding Group Co, which made its debut on dollar bond market on June 4 by selling $300 million notes.

The company, a wholly owned provincial State-owned enterprise which builds and operates toll roads and public transport for the hinterland province, sold the three-year notes at a coupon of 2.875 percent. The sale was underwritten by BNP Paribas and other leading banks. It was assigned a BBB+ rating by Fitch Ratings and an A3 rating by Moody's Investors Service.

"The ratings are credit-linked with Fitch's internal credit assessment of Anhui province. The strong linkages are evident in the province's 100 percent ownership of the company...and the overall strong strategic importance of company's operations to the province," Fitch said in a statement.

Other issuers were also able to enjoy the support from their directly linked governments, who deemed such companies as strategically important to the region's development, thus least likely to allow them to default. For example, Beijing Infrastructure Investment Co, a wholly owned SOE of the local government and the builder and operator of Beijing's sprawling subway network, sold three-year notes of 5 million euros with a 1 percent coupon this March, a record low borrowing cost so far among LGFVs.

By comparison, three-year domestically AAA-rated LGFVs bond were sold at a 4.2 percent average yield in the onshore market until Tuesday, according to Chinabond.com.

The bond was widely chased by yield-hungry institutional investors in the US and Europe, for its relatively high yield and low risk. When Guangzhou Communications Investment Group, a toll road and public transport company fully owned by the Guangzhou municipality, sold its $400 million notes in late May, bidding was 11.5 times of planned issuance. The enthusiasm has pushed the issuance price to 3 percent, 35 basis points down the guidance price.

Overseas investors have a very short time, usually one or two days, to decide their purchases after issuers staged road shows, routinely in Hong Kong, Singapore and London, a banker involved in such deals said on condition of anonymity.

Issuers so far are concentrated in a handful of provincial SOEs and LGFVs under municipalities with strong credit profiles, such as Beijing and Guangzhou. There are more than 10,000 LGFVs in China.

Ivan Chung, senior vice-president of Moody's Investors' Service, said: "Overseas investors are positive toward 'quality' LGFVs who come from wealthier regions. Issuers so far are weak in their standalone financial profiles so government support, including tax and dividend refund, and subsidies, became critical. It might be difficult for overseas investors to embrace LGFVs from lower and poorer authorities."

SOEs in China are still subjected to stringent approval by domestic regulators when it comes to offshore funding, and complications in repatriation of bond proceeds remain a major hurdle, analysts said. Unlike general SOEs that often have overseas business operations and hence can use the borrowed foreign currency locally, LGFVs are exclusively domestic-focused and hence need to come up with complicated ways to transfer the money inward.

These set-ups, along with moves taken to hedge the currency risk, may add costs and make overseas fundraising less appealing.

Terry Gao, a senior analyst with Fitch, said another critical problem for overseas investors is they are desperate to know more about the underlying assets behind these bonds. Lack of information disclosure has hampered informed decisions and the pricing mechanism.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 南投县| 沁水县| 吴桥县| 巴马| 永平县| 临猗县| 阿尔山市| 襄汾县| 洞头县| 阳城县| 陆河县| 忻州市| 夹江县| 钟祥市| 丘北县| 若羌县| 牟定县| 格尔木市| 临潭县| 吴旗县| 金山区| 永宁县| 高唐县| 怀柔区| 绿春县| 通榆县| 阳信县| 永川市| 靖边县| 松溪县| 慈溪市| 蒙阴县| 平乐县| 绩溪县| 磴口县| 贵州省| 潮安县| 利津县| 和平县| 东平县| 金塔县| 繁昌县| 黄山市| 蓬溪县| 定日县| 申扎县| 陇西县| 玉屏| 巨鹿县| 若羌县| 北海市| 灌云县| 西盟| 开平市| 阿荣旗| 安龙县| 竹溪县| 股票| 西丰县| 新密市| 若尔盖县| 车致| 三穗县| 鄂托克旗| 福安市| 双流县| 罗田县| 汤阴县| 永康市| 兰坪| 独山县| 新乡县| 大同市| 玛沁县| 长岛县| 咸丰县| 阿图什市| 吉水县| 秭归县| 宾川县| 高雄县| 博白县|