男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Technology

JD.com locked in war with delivery companies

Xinhua | Updated: 2017-07-25 11:27

JD.com locked in war with delivery companies

An employee works at a JD.com logistic center in Langfang, Hebei province, November 10, 2015.[Photo/Agencies]

SHANGHAI - Chinese e-commerce platform JD.com is locked in a war with two of the country's major courier companies.

On Monday afternoon, Sun Weimin, deputy chairman of e-commerce platform Suning Commerce Group, which holds shares in courier company TTK Express, said on Weibo that JD.com has stopped cooperation with TTK Express because JD.com claimed "the courier company's service was the worst."

Sun said that TTK was one of the top 10 couriers in China, and that JD.com's decision to cut ties with TTK was "predictable" because of the direct competition between Suning and JD.com.

TTK Express has written a letter to the government for fair treatment, according to Sun.

Following Sun's complaint, JD.com released a statement explaining why it ended cooperation with TTK. According to the statement, JD.com received "a large number of complaints from customers about TTK's poor service."

"TTK Express was the worst among all the courier companies JD.com works with based on a ranking issued by the State Post Bureau," the statement said. It said that TTK was kicked out because JD.com employs a "survival of the fittest" system to make sure customers benefit from good delivery services.

"We suggest Mr Sun stop crying over spilled milk and focus on how to improve TTK's management and services," said the statement.

But TTK was not the only courier company on JD.com's blacklist.

According to a statement issued on Monday night by another major delivery company, YTO Express, JD.com had demanded all vendors on the e-commerce platform work with JD.com's recommended couriers by the end of July, and YTO was not on the list.

According to YTO Express, JD.com's move "has limited impact" on the company because JD.com's parcels only account for about 2 percent of YTO's business.

"We are against any hegemony in this business, and we hope the barriers in the delivery business for e-commerce companies can be broken," the statement said.

According to a June compilation of consumer complaints issued by the State Post Bureau, of the 43 monitored delivery companies, YTO ranked 11th, with only 3.52 valid complaints out of a million, while TTK stood at 14th, with 5.51 valid complaints out of a million. The figures indicated that the two companies ranked in the upper third of the 43 companies monitored.

JD.com's battle with the two companies has fueled speculation that it was a result of competition between JD.com and another e-commerce powerhouse, Alibaba.

Alibaba invested in YTO Express in 2015, holding about 17 percent of the courier company's shares. Alibaba also invested in Suning in 2016, holding about 20 percent of its shares.

"JD.com has its own delivery teams, so to some extent, there is some competition between the company and the two couriers," said Cao Lei, with the China E-commerce Research Center. "Under such circumstances, JD.com should release convincing standards that show the quality of TTK and YTO's services."

Liu Chunquan, a lawyer with Beijing Suewin Law Firm, said that it is necessary to consider if there is unfair competition, and if such business wars affect customers.

"These things matter more than simple words of war," Liu said.

China's express delivery sector continued steady growth in the second quarter of this year.

The sector generated more than 120 billion yuan ($17.8 billion) of revenue in the April-June period, up 27.6 percent year on year, a growth rate around four times the national GDP increase, according to the State Post Bureau. A total of 9.8 billion deliveries were made during the period, up 31.3 percent from a year ago.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿图什市| 保定市| 丰原市| 盘锦市| 新绛县| 黔西县| 明水县| 鸡东县| 林甸县| 蕲春县| 增城市| 武胜县| 安陆市| 宁城县| 邵阳市| 河间市| 绍兴县| 镇康县| 广丰县| 诏安县| 宜丰县| 丹寨县| 陆河县| 宁河县| 紫金县| 墨竹工卡县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 金华市| 娄烦县| 吴堡县| 墨脱县| 甘南县| 长寿区| 威远县| 咸宁市| 海口市| 呼和浩特市| 海晏县| 紫阳县| 措勤县| 黑水县| 临高县| 共和县| 彭泽县| 抚州市| 柘城县| 呼伦贝尔市| 搜索| 永丰县| 金乡县| 丰原市| 鲁甸县| 中卫市| 宁化县| 军事| 三门县| 手机| 阳新县| 晋州市| 张掖市| 楚雄市| 天津市| 保康县| 阳江市| 常德市| 苗栗市| 青川县| 锡林浩特市| 伊宁市| 阳泉市| 娄烦县| 宜兰县| 徐闻县| 曲靖市| 九台市| 乳源| 长沙市| 靖远县| 黑龙江省| 天等县| 兴文县| 江油市|