男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
BIZCHINA> IPR Issue
Music companies shift IPR tactics
By Wu Jiao (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-11-11 10:25

The country's first copyright infringement lawsuits against singing machine producers and sellers have been filed in Beijing No 2 Intermediate People's Court, officials with the court said on Friday.

Relatedreadings:
Music companies shift IPR tacticsKaraoke piracy crackdown stirs mounting debate
Music companies shift IPR tactics Warner sues karaoke hall for infringement
Music companies shift IPR tactics Karaoke bars may pay for music
Previously, music organizations tended to sue KTV clubs. Some analysts see the shift to suing producers and sellers of singing machines as a potential new trend to combat copyright infringement.

The Music Copyright Society of China (MCSC) sued Xiamen-based Amoi Electronics as the company's PK-DVD 680 singing machines were sold to the market containing 20 songs that had not been copyrighted by the MCSC. The society is demanding Amoi pay 49,000 yuan (US$6,100) in compensation.

Music companies shift IPR tactics
An outlet of Cashbox KTV in Shanghai. [newsphoto/file]
Music companies shift IPR tactics
The MCSC is also suing sellers of the PK-680 singing machine for compensation.

The case is still under investigation and the date of the first hearing has not been decided, said Gao Zhihai, an employee of the court.

Meanwhile, the court received a case in which Beijing-based children's music agent Kirin Kid Productions sued Changzhou-based Shinco Electronic Group Co, Ltd as its DG-900 singing machine contained copyrighted songs. Kirin Kid demanded 59,000 yuan (US$7,573) in compensation.

Wang Xuemei, market manager with Kirin Kid Productions told China Daily the two companies have already settled out of court.

Wang would not reveal the exact amount of compensation Shinco will pay.

The two cases are believed by legal experts to signal a new trend in IPR protection campaigns.

According to a judge surnamed Zhang in charge of IPR infringement cases, copyright holders used to prefer to sue KTV owners for IRP infringement.

But their lawsuits often failed as KTV owners claimed the singing machines had come with the songs preloaded, according to Zhang.

Legal experts such as Zhang expect the implementation of KTV copyright fees will ease the tension between copyright holders and music broadcasters.

The National Copyright Administration (NCA) said on Thursday that KTV club owners should pay a daily 12 yuan (US$1.5) copyright fee for each singing room. The decision came after a two-month soliciting of opinions from copyright holders, KTV goers and owners.

The fee programme will start in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou before going national, according to a notice posted on the official website of the NCA.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
主站蜘蛛池模板: 囊谦县| 周至县| 梅河口市| 安远县| 鄯善县| 香格里拉县| 夏津县| 察隅县| 扬州市| 子长县| 观塘区| 庐江县| 沂南县| 全州县| 清远市| 蒙阴县| 大丰市| 会昌县| 莎车县| 双牌县| 页游| 遂昌县| 安平县| 望奎县| 呼伦贝尔市| 洛扎县| 灯塔市| 鄄城县| 桐庐县| 策勒县| 博野县| 丹东市| 天峨县| 元氏县| 安塞县| 富裕县| 江西省| 揭阳市| 左贡县| 达拉特旗| 富蕴县| 子长县| 乌兰察布市| 高邮市| 伊金霍洛旗| 吴堡县| 黄石市| 兖州市| 遵义县| 怀宁县| 兴隆县| 青龙| 凤凰县| 集贤县| 乐至县| 当涂县| 大冶市| 随州市| 临沂市| 彰化县| 开远市| 谷城县| 区。| 蛟河市| 和政县| 阳朔县| 绍兴县| 秦皇岛市| 惠州市| 泸水县| 衡山县| 玉树县| 毕节市| 沙河市| 玉溪市| 噶尔县| 康马县| 云阳县| 丁青县| 潜江市| 高阳县| 綦江县|