男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Shoemakers to suffer EU anti-dumping hit

By Diao Ying (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-12-19 09:49

The vast majority of Chinese footwear manufacturers will most likely not file suit against an anti-dumping tariff from the European Union as the deadline for litigation draws near, partly due to what would be expensive, lengthy legal battles.

Related readings:
 Trade: Europe deficit with China hits new high
 Firms prepare for EU rules on chemical goods imports
 China economy status deal might help EU
 Ministry of Commerce backs shoemakers' EU lawsuits

The European Union has imposed a 16.5 per cent anti-dumping tariff on leather shoes imported from China since October 7. Over 1,200 shoemakers were effected, though only four are fighting back through lawsuits in the EU courts.

Two of these firms are Zhejiang-based enterprises, including Aokang Group, the largest privately owned footwear manufacturer, and Taima Shoes Group, the third-largest shoe firm in the province. They are joined by two Guangdong-based companies: Golden Step Industrial Co Ltd and Xinsheng Gangyuan Shoes Group.

Guo Weiwen, an official with another Guangdong-based company, Apach Footwear, said that most small- and medium-sized enterprises are trying to work around the tariffs.

"Most enterprises turn to other strategies such as adjusting product structure and changing their export market," she said. "Some of them even plan to recede from the EU market."

Wang Xuehua, a lawyer specializing in anti-dumping with the Beijing Huanzhong Law Firm said that the high cost, complicated legal procedures, and unpredictable result of suing has stopped most enterprises from filing.

The legal procedure to counter anti-dumping charges can be very time consuming, and "it is possible that the two-year period will come to an end before the investigation is completed," said Wei Yafei, a spokeswoman with the China Leather Industry Association.

The four bigger players that are suing, however, feel they have a case.

"The European Union's action does not follow the rules of the World Trade Organization and the convention of the industry," said Liao Yue, chairman of Taima, one of the companies taking legal action. "They imposed tariffs on us without investigating my company."

The two Guangdong enterprises that decided to file the suit, according to Guo of Apach, were "the sample enterprises chosen by the European Union during the investigation, so they have experience in dealing with legal issues."

Shoemaker Aokang said it already handed its litigation materials to the European court in Brussels and are waiting for reaction.

"We hope we can learn something from this case, and we need to gain some experience for other enterprises in the future," said Wei Kaimeng, a spokesman with Aokang.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



主站蜘蛛池模板: 越西县| 永年县| 南阳市| 南岸区| 应用必备| 沽源县| 嘉定区| 满城县| 汉寿县| 大英县| 布拖县| 定安县| 吉林市| 新和县| 凤山市| 铅山县| 衡山县| 石门县| 丽江市| 萨迦县| 乌恰县| 湟源县| 绥德县| 巍山| 武定县| 巫溪县| 西城区| 眉山市| 牙克石市| 岳阳市| 鄄城县| 咸阳市| 浑源县| 晋城| 江山市| 锡林浩特市| 岐山县| 澄江县| 夏邑县| 铁力市| 双辽市| 平陆县| 吴堡县| 富裕县| 周口市| 元阳县| 高尔夫| 叙永县| 阿图什市| 锡林浩特市| 昭通市| 珠海市| 渝北区| 平和县| 金华市| 唐海县| 曲水县| 龙海市| 鸡泽县| 来凤县| 鄂托克前旗| 翁源县| 巴里| 株洲市| 宁陕县| 沁水县| 钟祥市| 水富县| 淮阳县| 浑源县| 河间市| 商南县| 雷山县| 谷城县| 门头沟区| 二手房| 苍山县| 清涧县| 阿克陶县| 永善县| 定南县| 濮阳县|