男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Trademark body sued in latest Wahaha-Danone twist

By Wang Zhenghua (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-09-01 11:04

The legal wrangle between Danone and Wahaha has spread beyond the two companies to the nation's trademark authority.

Hangzhou Wahaha Foods Co, one of five joint ventures set up by the two firms, has sued the Beijing-based State Trademark Bureau over what it claims was "improper administrative behavior" in 1996 and 1997.

Related readings:

 Lawyers divided over Wahaha deal
 Wahaha in troubled waters Ministry denies intervening in Danone, Wahaha dispute Wahaha lays into Danone

Special Coverage:
Wahaha vs Danone 

H angzhou Wahaha Foods is 51 percent-owned by French food giant Danone Groupe SA, with the rest controlled by China's largest drinks producer Wahaha Group.

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court told China Daily on Friday that Wahaha Foods has demanded the trademark bureau rescind its rejection of applications to transfer the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures because it did not issue a written notice or give a reason for its decisions at the time. The court has accepted the case.

A spokesman with the trademark bureau said on Friday that it has yet to be notified of the legal action by the court. Danone declined to comment on the matter.

Danone, the world's largest yogurt maker, signed an agreement with Wahaha in 1996 that required the transfer of the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures.

Under the contract, the Chinese company was barred from making products that compete with those produced by the joint ventures, or from using the Wahaha brand without Danone's consent.

But the two parties are divided on the validity of the agreement after Wahaha Group opposed an acquisition proposal from Danone to take 51 percent of non-joint ventures set up by the Chinese side.

Zong Qinghou, founder of Wahaha Group, claims the transfer was not properly approved by the authorities, citing a reply from the State Trademark Bureau, which twice rejected applications for the transfer of the Wahaha brand in 1996 and 1997.

Wahaha claims Danone was aware of the situation and that the two sides had joined forces to get around the rules.

Danone initially said Wahaha had not applied properly for the transfer of the brand, for which Danone paid Wahaha Group 100 million yuan (US$13.25 million).


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



主站蜘蛛池模板: 简阳市| 贵溪市| 鄯善县| 昂仁县| 双桥区| 南部县| 秀山| 霍州市| 正镶白旗| 瑞昌市| 阿拉善盟| 资源县| 梅河口市| 米林县| 大田县| 大余县| 友谊县| 鹰潭市| 齐齐哈尔市| 麻栗坡县| 永平县| 崇义县| 铁岭县| 察哈| 阳西县| 双辽市| 平远县| 西华县| 八宿县| 敦化市| 内江市| 二手房| 繁峙县| 高平市| 花莲市| 高台县| 湟中县| 轮台县| 东阿县| 库车县| 电白县| 运城市| 广水市| 两当县| 彩票| 山西省| 宕昌县| 兴城市| 望城县| 临澧县| 墨竹工卡县| 乌审旗| 怀柔区| 澄江县| 英德市| 阿合奇县| 阜新| 平和县| 澄城县| 耿马| 吉林市| 甘德县| 崇礼县| 虎林市| 安溪县| 云安县| 平山县| 扶绥县| 习水县| 芦山县| 厦门市| 明水县| 贵阳市| 金平| 五华县| 呼伦贝尔市| 洱源县| 南昌市| 精河县| 泾阳县| 武冈市| 潜江市|