男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 龙江县| 余姚市| 始兴县| 龙口市| 宁南县| 仁寿县| 秦皇岛市| 黑山县| 离岛区| 大厂| 辽中县| 吉水县| 新泰市| 中阳县| 新龙县| 灵山县| 和林格尔县| 万安县| 宾阳县| 许昌市| 钟祥市| 乐山市| 麦盖提县| 微山县| 四子王旗| 涡阳县| 嘉定区| 临澧县| 聂拉木县| 吐鲁番市| 钟祥市| 思茅市| 九台市| 长兴县| 延津县| 衡山县| 江永县| 依兰县| 枣强县| 常山县| 正镶白旗| 虞城县| 宣汉县| 蒙自县| 金乡县| 普定县| 固阳县| 商都县| 始兴县| 衡东县| 陆丰市| 来凤县| 莱州市| 固阳县| 白朗县| 芷江| 巴东县| 夹江县| 安图县| 柳州市| 同德县| 凤山市| 汽车| 仙居县| 应城市| 宣化县| 古田县| 鸡东县| 加查县| 鄯善县| 卫辉市| 渝中区| 梁平县| 深州市| 大理市| 张家川| 团风县| 腾冲县| 凌源市| 屏边| 江油市| 金平|