男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

CHINA / Regional

Ad rivals in court over contract dispute
By Cao Li (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-05-25 10:21

Having announced a huge yearly revenue increase just last Friday, Nasdaq-listed Chinese advertising company Focus Media found itself in the spotlight for far less welcome reasons Wednesday, as it appeared in court charged with unfair competition.

In the case's first hearing at Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court, Focus Media Holding Ltd and Shanghai Focus Media Advertising Co Ltd were jointly accused of illegally trying to expand their presence in 13 Hymart supermarkets in Shanghai and Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province.

The case was brought by CGEN Digital Media Network Co Ltd, one of Focus Media's major competitors, which claims Focus approached the 13 stores encouraging them to break their contracts with CGEN.

CGEN is demanding Focus cease all activities in the 13 stores, issue a public apology, and pay more than 13 million yuan (US$1.6 million) compensation.

Specializing in selling advertising space on LCD television screens in large supermarkets, CGEN claims it signed three-year exclusive contracts with 13 Hymart stores 11 in Shanghai and two in Hangzhou in 2004.

Attorney for CGEN Zhong Jinguang told the court yesterday that the company sent letters to the 13 stores in March, 2005, warning them not to breach the contracts by working with any "third party."

A month later CGEN received replies from the Shanghai Kangren Hymart Supermarket Trading Co Ltd which manages the stores, terminating the contracts.

"They accused CGEN of violating Internet law and other problems," Zhong said. "But those were all excuses."

Zhong showed the court a copy of Focus Media's international prospectus published in July, 2005.

In it, Focus says it is in the process of expanding its network into the Hymart chain, adding that, in order to ensure its presence in the stores, it has agreed to compensate the supermarket chain for costs incurred in defending any breach of contract suit brought by CGEN against Hymart.

CGEN successfully sued the 13 Hymart stores late last year, with the court ordering Hymart to pay CGEN 300,000 yuan (US$37,040) in compensation.

Representing Shanghai Focus, Yang Ming accepted Shanghai Focus had signed contracts with two Hymart stores in Hangzhou and installed facilities in 11 Shanghai stores, but said everything had been done in accordance with the law.

As his client's relationship with Focus Media Holding Ltd was purely as a business partner in Shanghai, he added, Shanghai Focus could not be held responsible for Focus Media's behaviour elsewhere.

"The prospectus was published in the United States and it is not proper to judge its validity in China," he said.

The case continues.


 
 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 轮台县| 永城市| 山东省| 泗阳县| 大理市| 青海省| 天镇县| 青田县| 海城市| 西昌市| 宜良县| 石楼县| 太康县| 房产| 喜德县| 祁东县| 察雅县| 万源市| 合作市| 延川县| 澄城县| 达孜县| 滨海县| 东源县| 太仆寺旗| 宽城| 铅山县| 洛川县| 富川| 东乌| 苏州市| 乌拉特前旗| 常德市| 合阳县| 涪陵区| 呼图壁县| 庆城县| 巫山县| 白玉县| 嫩江县| 岱山县| 隆昌县| 和林格尔县| 临漳县| 商河县| 镇远县| 丹巴县| 和林格尔县| 余江县| 贺州市| 车致| 屯昌县| 台南市| 亚东县| 麦盖提县| 连平县| 民和| 无棣县| 类乌齐县| 柳林县| 建水县| 罗甸县| 四平市| 吕梁市| 新余市| 仪征市| 旅游| 洪雅县| 山阴县| 陕西省| 繁昌县| 印江| 嘉黎县| 芜湖市| 伊吾县| 津南区| 龙川县| 新营市| 呼玛县| 鄱阳县| 温州市| 于都县|