男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Landmark ruling for consumers against airlines

By Xin Dingding (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-04-27 07:48

China Southern Airlines, one of the country's biggest carriers, lost a lawsuit on Wednesday after a court ruled it had failed to notify a customer that his flight might have been overbooked.

The ruling was without precedent in China. Courts have traditionally favored large enterprises and government departments in consumer-initiated lawsuits, even as such disputes have grown increasingly common in recent years.

The passenger, a Beijing resident known only by his surname, Xiao, sued China Southern for not allowing him to board an overbooked flight for which he had bought a ticket.

Xiao had purchased a ticket that had been discounted by 30 percent for flight CZ3112 from Beijing to Guangzhou on July 21, 2006. He paid 1,300 yuan ($168).

However, when he tried to check in, he was not allowed to board. Airline staff told him everyone had boarded the flight and that Xiao's ticket had been bumped by overbooking.

Staff told him that overbooking is an international practice, and that airline companies are allowed to sell 3 percent more tickets than seats available.

China Southern then arranged for Xiao to take the next flight, CZ3100, and upgraded him to a first-class seat. The flight was due to leave Beijing at 10:39 pm, two-and-a-half hours later than the original flight.

In response, Xiao accused the company of obscuring the truth, causing him to be delayed at the airport and violating his rights and interests. He decided to sue the company, demanding a public apology and 2,600 yuan in compensation, or double the cost of the ticket.

The People's Court of Chaoyang District heard the case on Tuesday.

"The defendant did not inform the plaintiff that the ticket sold to him was for an overbooked flight. That is cheating, and consequently the company violated the plaintiff's interests," said the man's lawyer.

The defense said overbooking is an internationally accepted practice aimed at hedging against possible losses.

Generally, airline companies inform passengers when their ticket is in the overbooking category, allowing them to decide whether or not to buy the ticket. China Southern failed to notify Xiao.

The court ruled that China Southern should pay Xiao 1,300 yuan for failing to inform him that he might not be allowed to fly as planned, though it also said the company had not cheated Xiao.

Overbooking is a fairly new concept in China, and few airlines bother to tell passengers about it.

The court sent a letter to the General Administration of Civil Aviation (CAAC) suggesting that it draft regulations on air ticket overbooking.

A CAAC official surnamed Wang told China Daily that the current system lacks rules on the practice.



Top China News  
Today's Top News  
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
主站蜘蛛池模板: 渭源县| 汝南县| 仁化县| 烟台市| 偃师市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 嵩明县| 崇阳县| 长白| 吴桥县| 门源| 满洲里市| 鸡东县| 无锡市| 博乐市| 临桂县| 仁怀市| 建瓯市| 衡阳市| 轮台县| 健康| 大邑县| 固镇县| 博客| 荣昌县| 沐川县| 永丰县| 察哈| 霍邱县| 昌平区| 庆安县| 龙井市| 普宁市| 礼泉县| 剑阁县| 丰宁| 夹江县| 泰和县| 深圳市| 济源市| 大庆市| 苏州市| 玉屏| 丹寨县| 容城县| 琼结县| 科技| 大冶市| 宜宾市| 武山县| 绍兴县| 丰台区| 深圳市| 淮北市| 江西省| 泸溪县| 南溪县| 顺义区| 延吉市| 遂平县| 正定县| 远安县| 武威市| 新沂市| 互助| 称多县| 繁峙县| 榆林市| 玉门市| 潞西市| 江门市| 莱西市| 东阳市| 广水市| 花莲市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 航空| 临城县| 潮州市| 临沧市| 丰都县| 万年县|