男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Home / World

What is the cost of electoral reform in Japan

By Zhou Muzhi | China Daily | Updated: 2009-08-12 07:50

Election heat is on in Japan. The two main political forces began campaigning for votes as soon as Prime Minister Taro Aso dissolved the House of Representatives of the Diet (or parliament) on July 21.

With economic recession, a soaring unemployment rate, astronomical budget deficits, huge government debts and an unpopular prime minister, the situation looks gloomy for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). And the opposition parties, led by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), are likely to win the majority in parliament.

Since the bursting of the economic bubble in the early 1990s, the Japanese economy has been sluggish. The "iron triangle between politicians, bureaucrats, and businesses" that steered Japan through the post-war economic recovery and rapid growth has lost its glamour. The former allies are even blaming each other now. In recent years, the ruling LDP and the opposition DPJ both have blamed bureaucrats for Japan's predicament.

In January 2008, before the financial crisis hit, Minister of Economic Policy Hiroko Ota admitted in the Diet: "Japan is not a first-class economy any longer."

The LDP and the DPJ may be baying for each other's blood but there are more similarities than differences between them. They have been advocating almost identical economic and social policies. To garner votes, they have promised benefits, allowances and tax cuts, despite the government debt being twice as large as the country's GDP.

The two parties are similar even on the diplomatic front because there's no point of contention. The reason for that is simple: the politicians have lost effective leadership and the bureaucrats - once famous for their competence - have degraded themselves. There doesn't seem to be any fundamental difference between the two parties because both are conservative in nature. The root cause of this sorry state of affairs, however, is the reform in the electoral system.

Before 1996, Japanese voters were divided into 129 constituencies. Each constituency elected two to six members to the House of the Representatives. That system allowed members of smaller parties to be elected to the Diet. The theme of Japanese politics used to be confrontation and compromise between the conservative LDP and the reformist Japan Socialist Party (JSP).

The LDP, no doubt, enjoyed a firm grip on power by pushing economic growth and using pork barrels. But the JSP could still woo voters by demanding fairer distribution of wealth and grab a considerable number of seats in the Diet. The two parties had effective checks on each other. But after the electoral system underwent a fundamental reform in 1996, 300 of the 480 members of the House of the Representatives are elected from single-seat constituencies. The rest enter the Diet under proportional representation.

The change tilted the scale toward big parties with huge funds and political clout. Candidates now have to depend on the big parties and please the conservative majority voters in their constituencies. The principle of winner-takes-all has stifled minority votes, precipitating the decline of left-wing parties like the JSP.

A few days ago, I asked former prime minister and JSP head Tomiichi Murayama whether the electoral reform was responsible for the wane in JSP's influence. Murayama, who led the JSP during its political zenith, said that indeed was the case, and he was saddened by the development.

Since the reform, the major parties, irrespective of whether they are in office or the opposition, have been conservative. Though the LDP and DPJ are fighting ferociously, theirs is not a tussle for ideology or principles, but to assume power.

Another ill effect of the single-seat constituency system is the moral degradation of politicians. For instance, in February, Shoichi Nakagawa, then minister of finance, appeared to be drunk at a G7 press conference. He slurred while addressing journalists and became a laughing stock of the global media and audience. It was even more shocking to see voters in his constituency, which his father and he had cultivated for 46 years, welcome him home with encouraging words, instead of denouncing his action.

Unfortunately, many competent Japanese politicians usually lack strong support in their own constituencies. In a single-seat constituency system voters usually judge a candidate by the favors they get from him or her. Hence, many elected representatives are not competent enough to deal with national politics.

Politicians who can inherit fame, koenkai (local support group) and funding channels from their fathers and even forefathers are a greater success in the single-seat constituency system, leading to hereditary politics.

People in Japan are still materially affluent. Though the government has run up a huge debt, insolvency of public budget is still not a real threat because the creditors of 95 percent of the debts are Japanese citizens.

The problem is that Japan has bid farewell to the age of progress. Entangled in old and new problems such as the decline of manufacturing industries, an aging population, a shrinking workforce, lack of social benefits and surging unemployment, the DPJ may not be able to do much better than its rival, even though it is tipped to win the election.

While that may be case, the competition between two homogeneous parties cannot arouse much fever in society, nor can it lead the country into a new age. In other words, the single-seat constituency system has led Japan astray.

The author is a professor in Tokyo Keizai University, Japan.

(China Daily 08/12/2009 page9)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 万盛区| 长泰县| 兴仁县| 沁阳市| 修武县| 淮北市| 临邑县| 东乡县| 青冈县| 蒙山县| 深泽县| 长海县| 日照市| 台南市| 达日县| 阿坝| 乌鲁木齐县| 北海市| 讷河市| 平谷区| 曲靖市| 老河口市| 阿合奇县| 富锦市| 平谷区| 宜州市| 通化县| 中超| 济阳县| 广昌县| 孝昌县| 宝清县| 苏尼特右旗| 岑溪市| 静安区| 曲阳县| 大渡口区| 全州县| 志丹县| 北票市| 类乌齐县| 灵山县| 始兴县| 文化| 格尔木市| 秦皇岛市| 泸州市| 得荣县| 京山县| 平度市| 嘉义县| 阿勒泰市| 遂宁市| 如东县| 禄丰县| 托里县| 马关县| 岳阳市| 阿勒泰市| 芦溪县| 汨罗市| 乌鲁木齐县| 铜山县| 句容市| 特克斯县| 保靖县| 广汉市| 富阳市| 平遥县| 堆龙德庆县| 江达县| 沙雅县| 孝感市| 江北区| 孝昌县| 揭东县| 彩票| 城固县| 大方县| 志丹县| 台前县| 永嘉县|