男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
  Home>News Center>China
       
 

People offer pros & cons over Beijing Zoo's removal
(China Daily)
Updated: 2004-06-10 22:30

Talk that the Beijing Zoo, located in downtown Beijing and built almost a century ago, may be moved 35 kilometres away to the outskirts has aroused heated discussion.

"The Beijing Zoo has become a part of Beijing residents' ordinary life, so whether to move it or not is a topic connected to the public interest and must be discussed," said Lei Yi, a researcher with the Institute of Modern History of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

The zoo, one of China's largest with tens of thousands of animals living in it, was built in 1906 in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) as China's first public zoo.

Early this year, Guo Baodong, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress, and Chen Ruijun, member of the CPPCC (Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference) Beijing Municipal Committee, made a proposal to move the Beijing Zoo from the inner city to the outskirts.

The current location of the zoo can cause cross-infections between humans and animals, pollute the urban environment and cause traffic jams, the proposal said adding that if it is moved to the suburbs where land prices are cheaper, animals will enjoy wider living spaces.

Relevant municipal departments have asked the Beijing Engineering Consulting Company to organize experts for further consultations and debate, said Wang Fenglin, chief economist of the company.

Experts have reached consensus that whether the zoo is moved or not, the vegetation that has existed for a century will not vanish and a good educational base will not be lost, Wang said.

It is unnecessary for the public to worry, Wang said.

But the public is worrying.

Lei Yi questioned the true incentive for the move, saying that the public has the right to know who will use the land where the zoo is currently located and for what purposes.

Chen Yueqin, the mother of a three-year-old child, is a lawyer working at a Beijing-based law firm. She said she usually takes her child to the zoo once or twice a month, but if the zoo is moved to the outskirts, it will be much more difficult for them to go there.

"The removal of the zoo ignores the right of the public to participate in decision making," she said.

If the zoo is moved out of the inner city, its function to educate will be weakened, said Wu Qing, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress. "So I firmly object to the zoo removal."

It is not convenient for the youngsters to go to the outskirts, so the removal of the zoo will make it more difficult for them to see animals, said Meng Zhaozhen, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Eleven Chinese workers killed in Afghan attack

 

   
 

Japan sending chemists to analyze bombs

 

   
 

Pandas gift people with more births

 

   
 

Industries cool down growth

 

   
 

Volkswagen sides with 2008 Games

 

   
 

State bank splits up in pilot reform

 

   
  State bank splits up in pilot reform
   
  Chinese automaker to set up plant in Indonesia
   
  Chinese FM to attend Reagan funeral
   
  Lottery scandal lands six officials in jail
   
  Beijingers rally around Olympic relay
   
  Nation hails new Iraq resolution
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  When will china have direct elections?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 澄江县| 射洪县| 旬阳县| 额敏县| 色达县| 措勤县| 华安县| 克什克腾旗| 玛沁县| 南丹县| 澎湖县| 黄冈市| 岚皋县| 绥化市| 太仓市| 桂阳县| 泾源县| 高雄县| 都匀市| 云龙县| 皮山县| 柞水县| 宝清县| 剑河县| 牙克石市| 鄂托克前旗| 富阳市| 平谷区| 汝州市| 临洮县| 吉安县| 镇康县| 盐源县| 喜德县| 揭东县| 綦江县| 怀远县| 邢台市| 盖州市| 衡东县| 玉门市| 九龙坡区| 淮安市| 通渭县| 乐安县| 清丰县| 惠水县| 孟村| 安康市| 札达县| 六枝特区| 安泽县| 深泽县| 嘉义市| 安仁县| 济阳县| 怀来县| 云安县| 济南市| 三穗县| 天津市| 沾化县| 平凉市| 鸡泽县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 延长县| 中山市| 郯城县| 介休市| 大理市| 抚州市| 大荔县| 孝昌县| 蓝田县| 正阳县| 钟山县| 五家渠市| 湖州市| 宁德市| 通辽市| 兴山县| 阿拉善盟|