男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

The burning question to landfill capacity lies with incineration

Updated: 2013-08-01 06:37

By Raymond So(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

A garbage crisis is looming in Hong Kong after the government failed to get the Legislative Council's (LegCo) nod on fund allocation for the study of the extension of existing landfills.

When the government withdrew its request for funds to study the extension of Tseung Kwan O landfill from LegCo, many commentators predicted the government would not be able to get LegCo endorsement for similar requests to study the extension of other landfills as well. This prophecy doesn't require a crystal ball. It is clear that landfills are not welcome by nearby residents, and the opposition voice is strong. The defeat somehow indicates that the government has too few allies in LegCo on this matter. Worse still, the garbage problem has become a political issue. With pressure from voters, it is not easy to get endorsements from lawmakers.

The struggle reflects the overriding reality that the traditional way of relying on landfills to dispose of garbage is no longer workable. What the city needs now for tackling the pressing garbage problem is a four-dimensional approach, which should consist of landfills, a garbage levy to reduce waste, incineration plants, and reclamation.

The burning question to landfill capacity lies with incineration

The city used to rely on landfills for garbage disposal in the past mainly because people did not have the mindset or channels to raise objections, and to protect their rights. In the colonial years, LegCo was dominated by pro-government members. The government could easily pass resolutions on the opening of new areas for landfills. There were cases in which the landfills were located in the urban area, such as the Jordan Valley landfill and the Sai Tso Wan landfill, which were located in East Kowloon. People living nearby suffered from poor air quality and other severe pollution problems until the two landfills were closed and have become parks after years of restoration. The clear lesson is, though landfills can be restored to become leisure areas, the process is time-consuming and costly. Having become a landfill, the land cannot be used for residential purposes because of the existence of biogas, which takes many years to diminish before development can be carried out. Very often, the restored land on landfill can only be used to build parks and playgrounds. Hence, while landfill is an essential element in garbage handling, this approach is likely to expire soon because new landfills can hardly be built.

The idea of garbage levy and waste reduction is appealing. According to many environmental concern groups, if the garbage production rate is reduced, there is no need for landfill extensions. The problem is, even with effective waste reduction, garbage will not totally disappear. Sooner or later the existing landfills will all hit capacity unless we can reduce waste by a drastic margin. However, a large reduction in waste calls for a heavy levy on garbage disposal, raising the problem of persuading people to accept the levy. Taiwan's experience shows that incinerators are still necessary even though they have significantly reduced garbage with a levy.

Incineration plants are clearly not welcome by many people for fear of poisonous gas and materials. Nevertheless, when we look at the garbage problem, we have no way out but to incinerate. Modern technologies have greatly reduced the production of poisonous materials, and shrink garbage to around one percent of the original volume, minimizing or eliminating the need to extend existing landfills. Incineration plants can help resolve major disputes surrounding the garbage problem; no wonder the government is pushing hard for this choice.

Residuals produced by incineration can be used for reclamation, which the government has planned to accomplish outside Victoria Harbor to further build up its land bank. Singapore has successfully reclaimed land with incineration residuals.

This is how the four-dimensional approach in garbage-handling works. First we install a garbage levy so as to reduce garbage growth. Then we reduce the volume of garbage through incineration, and dump the residuals on reclamation site or in landfills. As garbage is greatly reduced and the residuals are not as undesirable as normal garbage, the landfill problem can be alleviated as well.

The author is dean of the School of Business at Hang Seng Management College.

(HK Edition 08/01/2013 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 甘孜县| 平乡县| 宣威市| 龙南县| 池州市| 砀山县| 牡丹江市| 婺源县| 曲周县| 黎川县| 瓦房店市| 长武县| 兰西县| 建瓯市| 延川县| 措勤县| 米林县| 汕尾市| 连平县| 衡山县| 呼伦贝尔市| 开化县| 罗平县| 建宁县| 本溪市| 麟游县| 阳高县| 托里县| 玛沁县| 黄龙县| 呼伦贝尔市| 三门峡市| 沅陵县| 鲜城| 贵阳市| 凤城市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 托克托县| 晋州市| 横山县| 舒兰市| 蒲城县| 镇江市| 钟山县| 阳山县| 焦作市| 纳雍县| 当阳市| 乐安县| 聂荣县| 新丰县| 四会市| 嘉黎县| 青神县| 乐东| 兖州市| 睢宁县| 盐源县| 青河县| 元氏县| 余姚市| 绩溪县| 天等县| 万山特区| 桐柏县| 社旗县| 丹棱县| 乾安县| 和硕县| 甘洛县| 涡阳县| 田东县| 富宁县| 陆丰市| 小金县| 胶南市| 来凤县| 河池市| 石景山区| 射阳县| 黑龙江省| 麻阳|