男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Rise in tobacco tax means more hardship for the poor

Updated: 2014-02-28 05:26

By Feng Chi-shun(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Our Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah is prepared to increase the duty on each cigarette stick by 20 HK cents. Soon, an international brand of a pack of 20 will cost HK$54 instead of HK$50.

Dr Carmen Audera-Lopez, the acting team leader of the World Health Organization's tobacco-free initiative in the Western Pacific region, has predicted the price increase and applauded the decision. She commented that the Hong Kong government could increase it even more. She said, "The suggested tax increase is only a moderate one and considering that it has not been increased since 2011, it is probably just compensating for inflation". For tax rises to work, she said, they must occur regularly to make the habit less affordable.

Unfortunately, the hardship will hit the lowest-income group hardest, which happens to have the highest percentage of smokers. A few of them might successfully quit the habit because they cannot afford it anymore; meanwhile, the majority will continue to buy cigarettes at a higher cost, and hence become mired deeper in poverty.

It is an easy decision for our financial secretary to make because it is a popular move and it puts more money into the government coffers. He, of course, has carte blanche to bash smokers because they are perceived to be inconsiderate, addictive villains and most of all, a minority (about 11 percent) in society.

Rise in tobacco tax means more hardship for the poor

Rhetoric aside, the anti-smoking crusaders' main gripe is the harmful effect of passive smoking, and indeed, smoking in the presence of those who detest the smell or involuntarily suffer ill-health from it is indefensible. The fact that many smokers try defending their behavior makes the situation more offensive. It is no wonder that every issue associated with smoking elicits emotive and vitriolic reactions from the anti-smoking lobby. Anti-tobacco policies backed by the government are generally hostile towards smokers, including raising the tobacco tax over and over again.

In my opinion, there is no place for outright hostility toward anyone addicted to anything. Although perceived as a weakness, addiction is part of human nature, and we are all prone to it. Hostility derived from fanaticism does not win hearts or change behavior. After all, tobacco consumption is legal, and is not the only thing in this world that is killing us slowly.

Hostility breeds hostility, and usually results in defiance and or even illegal counter-measures. The government should brace itself for a surge in smuggling of mainland cigarettes when the tax increment for tobacco becomes effective.

The most unsavory aspect of smoking is that people usually become hooked when they are young and reckless, and it is an addiction which is very hard to kick. For centuries, emperors in China tried banning tobacco smoking among their subjects by imposing punishments as drastic as the death penalty, but without success. I had one patient who was able to kick his heroin addiction, but continued to smoke after numerous attempts to quit. This is the kind of addiction we are dealing with.

Regardless of the price hike, smokers will continue to smoke, and as long as adults smoke and tobacco is available, more youngsters will pick up the habit - a reality cogently illustrated by heroin addiction.

Perhaps there should be a change of tack in dealing with smokers. Instead of concentrating on efforts to punish tobacco addicts by making them pay more for their bad habit, society could do more to help them. The government could orchestrate a campaign to promote responsible smoking behavior, such as abstinence in the company of people who are vulnerable or object to the smoke. If all smokers are considerate of non-smokers, there will definitely be less unsympathetic and hostile anti-smoking crusaders around.

Instead of a prohibitive tobacco tax, which makes life difficult only for smokers who are poor, there should be widespread government-sponsored clinics providing nicotine-replacement therapy, counseling, hypnotherapy, and other effective treatments of proven value. Are we not doing these things for heroin addicts? Should we not show the same compassion for tobacco addicts?

Even Dr Judith Mackay, the matriarch of anti-tobacco crusaders, once said: "I don't hate the smokers, only the smoking."

The author was a consultant pathologist for the Hong Kong government and St. Paul's Hospital before his recent retirement. He was a lecturer at the Medical Faculty of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and a diplomate of the American Board of Pathologists.

(HK Edition 02/28/2014 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 乐亭县| 泉州市| 临江市| 洛扎县| 巴彦淖尔市| 鱼台县| 黎平县| 开阳县| 平南县| 遵义市| 克山县| 子长县| 陵川县| 罗源县| 称多县| 宣武区| 和田县| 吴旗县| 永新县| 长宁区| 客服| 九寨沟县| 灵川县| 香港 | 孝义市| 长泰县| 禄丰县| 寻甸| 如皋市| 安图县| 杭州市| 抚州市| 英超| 定日县| 二连浩特市| 德州市| 西昌市| 康保县| 自治县| 辽阳市| 丹凤县| 南涧| 合江县| 广安市| 威宁| 南平市| 苏尼特左旗| 庐江县| 玉屏| 广东省| 三门峡市| 万载县| 广宗县| 谷城县| 大关县| 彭泽县| 鄂州市| 洪雅县| 镇远县| 台东市| 江安县| 雷波县| 三门县| 扎鲁特旗| 鞍山市| 澜沧| 墨竹工卡县| 泸溪县| 车险| 闸北区| 仁布县| 阜城县| 会泽县| 耒阳市| 澄迈县| 焉耆| 集贤县| 德清县| 华池县| 莫力| 漯河市| 岳西县|