男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Tram drivers, experts oppose plan

Updated: 2015-08-25 07:32

By Luis Liu in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

The Hong Kong Tramway Workers Union launched a signature campaign on Monday against a proposal to the Town Planning Board (TPB) to remove Hong Kong's 110-year-old trams from Central district, while transport experts said there was no justification for cutting Hong Kong's tram services.

If the proposal is approved, 1,400 tram trips per day will be affected, according to the union. That puts over 300 frontline drivers and many maintenance workers' jobs at stake.

The union's chairman Kong Kam-man questioned the logic behind the proposal, as trams were not the biggest source of traffic congestion. The increasing number of private cars and illegally parked vehicles was more urgently in need of controlling, Kong said.

 Tram drivers, experts oppose plan

A Hong Kong Tramways driver plies his route along Des Voeux Road Central on Monday. A consulting company has suggested canceling the tram route from Central to Admiralty to reduce traffic congestion in the area. Parker Zheng / China Daily

The union will file a letter of opposition to the TPB next Monday.

A leading transport academic, Hung Wing-tat, supported this view. The associate professor of civil and structural engineering at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University said the trams were not "occupying the road", but shouldering a proportion of public transport users on a daily basis.

Hung cited results of previous research that show trams only take up less than 6 percent of the roads they are routed on, while buses occupy 10 to 12 percent and private cars take up 70 percent.

Meanwhile, the tram is still one of the most used short-distance forms of public transport. According to the Transport Department, 194,000 passengers take trams each day. If the service is taken away from Central district, 150,000 people would be affected, according to the union's assessment.

"If the tram service is canceled, the government will have a big headache (in public transport)," Hung said.

Hung also questioned the logic of the proposal, as trams enjoyed an exclusive lane in Central district which made them the "fastest vehicles" in that area - and the most efficient form of transport.

According to Hong Kong Tramways statistics, a tram can go as fast as 45 kilometers per hour.

Hung urged all related parties to halt the discussions until the Central-Wan Chai Bypass, which is under-construction, is completed (as planned) in 2017. This will ease traffic pressure there.

Chief Research Officer at think tank Civic Exchange Simon Ng felt the trams were actually victims of Central's crowded traffic, as too many trucks load and unload along the road, and too many buses run through it.

Legislator Wong Kwok-hing supported the signature campaign, stressing that the tram was not only a means of public transport but a Hong Kong icon. Cutting the line would hurt local transportation as well as Hong Kong's tourism industry, he said.

He also said the environmental friendliness of the tram could facilitate Hong Kong's efforts to be a greener city.

The town planning proposal, made by retired government town planner Sit Kwok-keung, suggested removing trams from Central to Admiralty, the city's busiest district, and demolishing tracks and stops to free up more space for other vehicles.

Lo Shun-hin contributed to the story.

luisliu@chinadailyhk.com

(HK Edition 08/25/2015 page7)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 乌兰县| 井陉县| 赤城县| 昭平县| 白山市| 葵青区| 和平区| 吉林市| 太仓市| 灯塔市| 瓦房店市| 娱乐| 云浮市| 宜兰市| 鹤峰县| 甘泉县| 施秉县| 眉山市| 深泽县| 岳池县| 丰镇市| 镇平县| 荣成市| 乡城县| 休宁县| 贵南县| 雷山县| 德令哈市| 资阳市| 昆山市| 城口县| 精河县| 南宁市| 赤壁市| 英山县| 昌宁县| 花垣县| 周至县| 通许县| 忻州市| 乌审旗| 彰武县| 宣武区| 贡嘎县| 淮安市| 尼勒克县| 阳江市| 五家渠市| 松桃| 军事| 孝义市| 高要市| 错那县| 齐河县| 胶州市| 偏关县| 云林县| 循化| 宁波市| 杭锦旗| 马边| 白山市| 峨眉山市| 安吉县| 平南县| 邻水| 贵定县| 家居| 余干县| 许昌县| 内江市| 长葛市| 门头沟区| 日土县| 安福县| 榆林市| 邹平县| 静海县| 广德县| 中牟县| 沙坪坝区| 贵定县|