男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Minority shareholders need to be protected

Updated: 2016-08-31 07:53

By Peter Liang(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Reports of Singapore allowing dual share listing on its stock exchange have brought to life an issue that most of us thought had been long buried in Hong Kong.

Neither the Hong Kong stock exchange, which supports dual share listing, nor the watchdog agency, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), which opposes it, has commented on the Lion City's latest move. But insiders have said they expect some stock exchange members to cite Singapore's threat to pressure the local bourse and regulatory authorities to review the controversial idea.

The issue was brought to the forefront a few years back when Chinese mainland e-commerce giant Alibaba sought to secure a listing in Hong Kong. But, the proposed transaction fell through after the SFC made known its objection to amending the Securities Ordinance to accommodate Alibaba's request for a dual share listing. Alibaba later secured a listing on the New York stock exchange.

Hong Kong's seemingly uncompromising position on Alibaba's case was seen by many stock brokers and investment bankers as an opportunity lost. They contended that banning dual share listing has made it difficult, if not impossible, for the city to attract IPOs (initial public offerings) of many mainland tech companies, whose owners need to raise new capital but want to retain full control of their enterprises.

The SFC reiterated its stand against dual share listing when the stock exchange proposed public discussions on the issue. The plan was later withdrawn.

Hong Kong incorporated the ban on dual share listing into the Securities Ordinance to provide an added layer of protection of the rights of minority shareholders. Dual share listing is inherently unfair to minority shareholders and is open to abuse by controlling shareholders. Additional safeguards against potential abuses would greatly increase the costs and workload of the SFC. It's just not worth the trouble.

In addition, the prohibition of class action lawsuits in Hong Kong has made it prohibitively costly and troublesome for minority shareholders themselves to seek redress and compensation from companies in cases of abuse.

Investors who are keen on buying mainland tech companies' shares should be able to do so through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect which is expected to come into play later this year.

 Minority shareholders need to be protected

The Singapore Stock Exchange - a key competitor in the region's financial race. A reported plan by the Lion City's bourse to introduce a dual share listing system has raised eyebrows in Hong Kong. Industry experts say they expect the Hong Kong bourse and securities watchdog to reignite debate on the contentious issue that has long been swept under the carpet. Nicky Loh / Bloomberg

(HK Edition 08/31/2016 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 镇沅| 沂源县| 山阴县| 化隆| 和龙市| 丰城市| 蚌埠市| 会昌县| 时尚| 竹山县| 句容市| 兴义市| 九台市| 会同县| 沾化县| 邵阳县| 昌邑市| 连平县| 新安县| 瑞昌市| 新绛县| 盐亭县| 马尔康县| 辉南县| 奇台县| 宜春市| 甘孜| 弥渡县| 天津市| 崇信县| 昔阳县| 垦利县| 正蓝旗| 龙岩市| 咸丰县| 邵武市| 无锡市| 舒兰市| 台北县| 那坡县| 武宁县| 攀枝花市| 交口县| 东台市| 烟台市| 盐城市| 舞钢市| 公安县| 铜山县| 东城区| 呼和浩特市| 通海县| 荆州市| 扶风县| 保亭| 浦县| 永和县| 巴塘县| 西安市| 平阳县| 岑溪市| 海兴县| 诏安县| 宣城市| 台州市| 甘德县| 绥芬河市| 乌拉特前旗| 修武县| 德安县| 武城县| 扶风县| 微山县| 清水河县| 北宁市| 六枝特区| 桐庐县| 方城县| 黄陵县| 镇雄县| 鄯善县| 云林县|