男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Top Stories

BOC weighs options after court ruling

By Li Xiang in Beijing | China Daily USA | Updated: 2015-12-03 11:56

Bank of China Ltd is seeking to appeal against a United States court order that imposes $50,000 daily fine on it for withholding information, its legal advisers said on Wednesday.

The State-owned lender was held in contempt by a US court for refusing to provide account details of Chinese customers accused of selling counterfeit luxury goods. The US court said the daily fines would be imposed from next Tuesday, unless BOC complies with the subpoena request for client information.

BOC has been involved in the legal dispute that stemmed from a case in 2010. Gucci, the luxury brand of Paris-based Kering SA, sued owners and operators of a Chinese website for trademark infringement, online sales of imitation handbags and other items.

The bank, which is not a defendant in the Gucci case, has claimed that it has been caught in between the conflicts of the legal systems of China and the US.

Jiang Ying, a lawyer at Allen & Overy, the law firm representing BOC, said that the fine is "unfair" for the bank, which is "innocently involved" in the case and it would put the bank in a dilemma of violating Chinese laws if it has to comply with the US laws.

The incident underscored the growing legal disputes facing Chinese financial institutions in the US under the controversial Long-Arm Statue, a legal provision that allows US courts to exercise jurisdiction over foreign entities, provided that the prospective defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the US, legal experts said.

Jiang said that the involved parties should be able to invoke the multilateral Hague Evidence Convention to resolve the dispute. The Hague procedure enables the plaintiff to obtain evidence, including bank account information, under the Chinese legal procedures.

Had Gucci opted to use the Hague Convention, they would have obtained the information they seek long before now, Jiang said.

Gucci also has the option to sue the defendants in China and obtain Chinese court's assistance in obtaining information and freezing accounts.

Jiang said that she is aware of at least three cases where the counsel representing Gucci successfully used Chinese courts to do so in recent years.

While it is hard to guess whether BOC will win its appeal, Jiang said the case will far reaching impact on Chinese companies and all foreign businesses in the US affected by the long-arm jurisdiction.

"If the court ruling goes against the bank, Chinese companies may become more cautious or even less willing to invest, set up offices or list their shares in the US," said Shi Jinjuan, a partner of law firm Dacheng Dentons in Shanghai.

lixiang@chinadaily.com.cn

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 博罗县| 伊金霍洛旗| 呼图壁县| 丹凤县| 旌德县| 上饶县| 谢通门县| 高碑店市| 桐梓县| 廉江市| 兰坪| 沙坪坝区| 新野县| 汉川市| 南宁市| 新干县| 淅川县| 蓬安县| 宁夏| 黔西县| 吴忠市| 冷水江市| 龙游县| 昌吉市| 基隆市| 梧州市| 泽州县| 揭阳市| 裕民县| 阿瓦提县| 和顺县| 邯郸市| 苗栗县| 增城市| 云霄县| 长治市| 临沭县| 富锦市| 大新县| 常宁市| 武邑县| 长丰县| 仙桃市| 临沭县| 台南县| 扎兰屯市| 霍林郭勒市| 太仆寺旗| 波密县| 思南县| 巴里| 吕梁市| 二手房| 陕西省| 即墨市| 泸定县| 汾西县| 绍兴县| 荆门市| 盱眙县| 舒城县| 荆门市| 永顺县| 漯河市| 新田县| 上饶市| 泽州县| 武陟县| 清流县| 乌兰县| 固镇县| 洪湖市| 泾川县| 凤台县| 海口市| 昌都县| 普宁市| 平顶山市| 铜鼓县| 库伦旗| 轮台县| 昭平县|