男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   
 
Who "solves" domain name disputes?
By Kevin Nie (China IP)
Updated: 2012-01-06

The domain name dispute over the use of mercer.com.cn came to an end after four years of settlement negotiation. The significance of the case for IP industry is that it has gone through all the legal procedures to finality: from domain name complaint, to the trial of first instance, the trial of second instance and finally ended in the appellate court for retrial. During this process there has been a great deal of legal maneuvering: objection to jurisdiction was raised; the choice of forum was changed and the case was moved from Shanghai to Beijing; the settlement contents included the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (DNDRC) of China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, Shanghai Higher People's Court, Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court, Beijing Higher People's Court and The Supreme People's Court. Therefore, the case provides virtually all of us within the IP field an opportunity to take a glimpse into the full range of possible legal procedure that may come into play, while providing legal services or advice in such a typical case in the field of domain name disputes.

Who
Who "Solves" Domain Name Disputes?

It was in August, 1999 that the first case involving a domain name dispute was first filed in China in the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court. From then on, the number of domain name disputes has greatly increased. However, many enterprises are perplexed because they do not know how to file a case or who has the jurisdiction over the dispute.

China has formulated a series of laws and regulations that assist in the settlement of domain name dispute resolutions through arbitration or litigation. However, there are still many difficulties in putting these rules into practice. For example, the judgments reached may be inconsistent, if not totally different, due to the differences in the local methods used for verification of evidence and application of the laws. Therefore, it seems that even though the case has ended, we have just begun the process of understanding and applying the rules and procedures for domain name protection.



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The J-Innovation

The future of China & WTO

JETRO: A decade of development in China

The protection of design on printed flat works

主站蜘蛛池模板: 申扎县| 易门县| 兴山县| 静海县| 宝坻区| 治县。| 朝阳市| 岗巴县| 济宁市| 新邵县| 科技| 兴和县| 会东县| 都安| 缙云县| 沁源县| 巴塘县| 平原县| 车致| 自贡市| 五大连池市| 乌恰县| 桃源县| 漠河县| 巴楚县| 大同县| 镇巴县| 蒙山县| 阿巴嘎旗| 易门县| 惠水县| 合山市| 天台县| 尉氏县| 金塔县| 会理县| 呼和浩特市| 赤水市| 双城市| 临海市| 安多县| 萨迦县| 汪清县| 朝阳县| 诸城市| 武鸣县| 利津县| 襄城县| 望江县| 临猗县| 隆昌县| 株洲县| 湖州市| 麟游县| 古丈县| 孝义市| 徐州市| 龙州县| 洛浦县| 西林县| 印江| 华阴市| 工布江达县| 探索| 长泰县| 天祝| 柏乡县| 武宣县| 耒阳市| 凤阳县| 乳源| 湖南省| 怀柔区| 临湘市| 五台县| 惠东县| 黄陵县| 台州市| 崇礼县| 光泽县| 桐庐县| 龙南县|