男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

We have launched Eemail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
You Are Here: Home > Research > Public Administration and Human Resources> What's New

Public Administration and Human Resources

Innovate Social Governance Methods and Improve Grassroots Level Service -- A Case Study on Deqing County’s Practice of Social Governance at Grassroots Level in the New Era (No.58, 2018)

2018-05-23

By Long Haibo & Shen Yuan, Research Team on “Innovative Development of Social Governance in China”, Institute of Public Administration and Human Resources, DRC

Research Report No.58, 2018 (Total 5333) 2018-3-29

Abstract: At present, the overall performance of social governance at the grassroots level is generally sound. Local governments have shifted the focus of social governance down to the grassroots level, forming a governance model featured by gridded management, the coordination between communities, social organizations and social workers and collaborative governance. Deqing county in Chaozhou city of Zhejiang province has formed some effective measures by innovating social governance methods and constantly improving self-governance capabilities and management service at the grassroots level. On the one hand, it has invited some local worthies as consultants to participate in democratic consultations and give advises on village affairs and strived to cultivate an urban-rural integration model for social governance based on the rule of law, the rule of virtue and self-governance. On the other hand, through the establishment of the “happy community” center, the county government has streamlined the different functions of the community center, and enhanced the overall service level. For future development, the county government needs to push forward the social governance work at the grassroots level in the new era. First, it needs to pay more attention to the governance effectiveness, and focus on leveraging the incentive mechanism; second, efforts need to be made to consolidate the foundation of democratic consultations and build a new interactive relation between the government and the community; third, it needs to further flesh out the top-level design of policies and realize the integration of grassroots service.

Key words: social governance, multiple and collaborative governance, township counselor conference, “happy community” center

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 南京市| 梁山县| 探索| 安庆市| 宾川县| 武冈市| 张家界市| 鹰潭市| 博兴县| 西林县| 金山区| 蒲城县| 崇仁县| 栖霞市| 黔西县| 定日县| 铜陵市| 乐亭县| 南皮县| 红桥区| 尼勒克县| 乌鲁木齐县| 柳州市| 漳浦县| 墨江| 永济市| 玉溪市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 鲜城| 沭阳县| 筠连县| 新源县| 囊谦县| 万荣县| 通州区| 麻江县| 霍城县| 盐亭县| 宁远县| 五家渠市| 满城县| 淮南市| 马龙县| 交口县| 宁陵县| 苗栗市| 万载县| 建湖县| 长兴县| 瑞安市| 青浦区| 河东区| 博野县| 岚皋县| 连南| 南乐县| 丹阳市| 临漳县| 永寿县| 肇东市| 博湖县| 桂东县| 华宁县| 乌拉特中旗| 儋州市| 隆德县| 恩平市| 辉县市| 饶阳县| 阿勒泰市| 沽源县| 霸州市| 泰和县| 札达县| 资溪县| 万州区| 盘锦市| 平乡县| 松阳县| 景洪市| 乌拉特中旗| 武宁县|