男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
 
   
中文
 
Home> Local
Controversy surrounds publicizing offenders' personal info
By Guo Rui ( China Daily )
Updated: 2010-07-19

Public notices revealing names in prostitution case stir debate

WUHAN - A public notice disclosing the personal information of people involved in a prostitution case in Hubei's provincial capital has aroused national controversy over privacy issues.

The Hongshan police sub-bureau pasted a special public notice about a June 26 raid of a local massage parlor along the streets in the Chenjiawan community on July 7.

The notice said the sex worker and patron were both sentenced to one year of detention education. The establishment's owner had been put in administrative detention for 15 days before being transferred to a criminal detention facility on July 6 on charges of "sheltering prostitution". The parlor's hostess, who fled the scene, has been put on a law enforcement wanted list.

The notice revealed the offenders' personal information, including their names and ages.

Many community residents, who had long been concerned about the their neighborhood's increasingly negative reputation, applauded the move.

"Shame on the prostitution!" Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a local resident surnamed Liu as saying.

"Their names should be publicized, and people should loathe and despise them."

However, most believe publicizing the offenders' real names is a violation of their privacy.

The news story became one of the most commented upon online. A survey on sina.com, the country's largest news portal, found 60.3 percent of the 101,758 netizens polled by 6 pm on Sunday believed that publicly revealing offenders' real names is a violation of privacy.

Only 36.2 percent of those surveyed supported the move, saying it will help deter illegal activities, such as prostitution.

Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a lawyer surnamed Gu as saying the police acted in accordance with law.

"Because the offense was proven, there was no invasion of privacy," Gu said.

But another lawyer, Zhang Wanying, believed the move was inappropriate.

"Even criminals have the right to privacy," Zhang said.

Henan Provincial Party School professor Zhang Tingyin told China Daily the issue should be viewed from two perspectives - that of the individual and that of society.

"On the level of the individual, the offenders' privacy has been violated and it may have negative impacts on their future lives," he explained.

"On the level of society, labeling them as criminals involved in prostitution subjects them to social discrimination."

In a similar case, the publication of two sex workers' and two patrons' photographs by media in Dongguan, Guangdong province, aroused online controversy over the weekend.

A radio and television station in Dongguan's Qingxi township included three photographs of offenders in a report on a July 5 raid. When the photographs were posted online, a thread at Mop.com questioning their release sparked heated controversy, with most Web users opposed to publicizing the photos.

China Daily

(China Daily 07/19/2010 page4)

 
Video
Specials



 
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 揭西县| 麻阳| 莱阳市| 山东省| 石泉县| 剑川县| 黄石市| 扎鲁特旗| 托克逊县| 靖安县| 台南市| 定边县| 靖江市| 郁南县| 青海省| 庄浪县| 达孜县| 峨眉山市| 武陟县| 都匀市| 永福县| 滨海县| 南康市| 出国| 寿光市| 台东市| 茌平县| 黔南| 陆丰市| 太原市| 太原市| 茌平县| 饶平县| 威信县| 昔阳县| 威宁| 吉木萨尔县| 大宁县| 武功县| 新龙县| 胶南市| 阿瓦提县| 塘沽区| 扶绥县| 博野县| 澄江县| 长治市| 菏泽市| 永昌县| 山阴县| 尉氏县| 华坪县| 西和县| 双江| 洪雅县| 镇坪县| 辉县市| 永川市| 孝昌县| 绍兴市| 合水县| 积石山| 栾川县| 石景山区| 桃园县| 鄂托克前旗| 平泉县| 常德市| 读书| 白山市| 获嘉县| 休宁县| 惠东县| 玉溪市| 曲阜市| 怀宁县| 固阳县| 黎城县| 息烽县| 新绛县| 钟山县| 繁峙县|