男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
OPINION> Commentary
Let market forces prevail
(China Daily)
Updated: 2008-12-22 07:44

The policy support that the central government gives is meant to create a favorable climate for the sluggish property market to bottom out. Local governments can surely do their bit to help bring such policy incentives into full play. But what they should never try to do is replace market forces with administrative measures to stop the cyclical correction of housing prices.

In the latest attempt to buoy the declining domestic property market, the State Council announced last week that it will waive business tax on real estate sales and relax mortgage policies for second-home buyers.

As a key sector that contributes to a quarter of China's fixed-asset investment and employs 77 million people, the downward adjustment of the property market certainly justifies government support, especially when the national economy has been hit increasingly hard by the global financial crisis and economic recession.

Latest statistics show that the floor space of residential properties sold in the first 11 months fell 18.8 percent from a year earlier, while real estate investment growth slowed to 22.7 percent in the January-November period, down from 24.6 percent in the first 10 months.

By gradually removing restrictive measures, adopted to rein in the unchecked surge in housing prices in recent years, the central government made clear its resolve to revive the property market. But the latest policy relaxation aims to not only revamp a key growth engine for the economy but, more important, to substantially increase supply of affordable housing for the poor.

For local governments, which usually depend heavily on revenues from the real estate sector, the central government's new stimulus package is certainly more than welcome.

Nevertheless, that does not mean local governments can hence step in to prevent property developers from cutting prices to boost sales.

It was reported that local authorities in Nanjing had decided to fine two developers for "cutting prices below cost".

Such direct government intervention in house prices appears anachronistic.

There were indeed many public calls for government intervention in the past several years when housing prices went through the roof in many Chinese cities. But as house prices fall now, some local officials venture to stand in the way of a cyclical correction that seems to have just begun.

Worse, such efforts to control house prices will go largely in vain. They can only protract the adjustment that should be fundamentally driven by market forces.

Local governments should focus on fulfilling their promises of more low-rent and affordable housing for the poor. As for the commercial property market, they can just leave it to suppliers and buyers. A drastic correction must be painful. But it is good for a fast recovery.

(China Daily 12/22/2008 page4)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 宜兴市| 桐柏县| 万荣县| 万全县| 黎城县| 方山县| 龙口市| 屏东县| 黑龙江省| 怀集县| 陕西省| 霍州市| 观塘区| 自贡市| 利辛县| 九龙县| 锦州市| 冷水江市| 安塞县| 全椒县| 潜江市| 揭阳市| 舟山市| 恩施市| 安远县| 肥城市| 安阳县| 景德镇市| 津南区| 康定县| 五大连池市| 荔波县| 高平市| 黎城县| 阿巴嘎旗| 华容县| 金寨县| 额济纳旗| 客服| 新津县| 莆田市| 库尔勒市| 达尔| 四子王旗| 桂东县| 洛隆县| 清徐县| 堆龙德庆县| 大余县| 石屏县| 玛多县| 玛纳斯县| 伊通| 子洲县| 高要市| 赤城县| 乃东县| 洪洞县| 石屏县| 扎赉特旗| 报价| 岳西县| 同心县| 龙岩市| 蓬安县| 调兵山市| 孝昌县| 会泽县| 丰镇市| 新竹县| 故城县| 通道| 潍坊市| 海盐县| 东宁县| 抚顺市| 衡山县| 吴川市| 峨眉山市| 贡觉县| 黑水县| 丰镇市|