男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
OPINION> Commentary
Justice must be done
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-03-11 07:48

In the past years, the annual performance reports of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have drawn the lowest approval ratings among the six work reports presented to the National People's Congress.

This year, we wait to find out how the deputies, who listened in great attention at the Great Hall of the People yesterday, vote for them.

From the texts of what the country's two top judicial officials delivered yesterday afternoon, one can find little to criticize. The reports were carefully worded, the formats followed the formula of featuring past-year achievements and new-year resolutions.

And both, acknowledging that their work in the previous year fell short of public expectations, pledged to apply stricter self-discipline.

The top court, for example, admitted to some instances of inefficiency, incapability, disregard for society and bribery.

Similarly, the top procuratorate conceded cases of abuse of power, lack of supervision and self-regulation, and corruption.

It is good to know they have seen the gap between their performance and our expectations, and want to improve. That is essential to repairing the judiciary's image, tarnished, most famously, in the case of duo mao mao, or hide-and -seek, a wildly popular new catchword on the Internet.

It refers to an inmate in a Yunnan judicial detention facility who was beaten to death by prison bullies. But local authorities announced he had died in an accident when playing duo mao mao. The truth did not emerge until higher authorities got involved amidst an online public uproar.

A senior official of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, conceding that prison bullies have been a problem for a long time, complained that the Yunnan incident had been sensationalized. He was right. But this is the reality in the Internet age - bad news can spread at the speed of a click and get blown out of all proportion.

We agree with the two top judicial organs that the quality of legal professionals leaves more to be desired; and that should not be a big issue given our highly productive institutions of higher learning.

But it is not as simple as hiring more people with law degrees; people are more concerned about whether the courts and the procuratorates are discharging their duties with commitment to justice - and not with the contents of the reports they hand in every year.

The judiciary must demonstrate with action that they deserve our fullest trust.

(China Daily 03/11/2009 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 绍兴市| 江阴市| 德兴市| 崇义县| 清新县| 西昌市| 北海市| 扶沟县| 榆社县| 玉门市| 乐东| 射阳县| 清丰县| 湖州市| 柳河县| 阳东县| 得荣县| 曲阜市| 嵊泗县| 同心县| 沙雅县| 睢宁县| 山阴县| 临高县| 石台县| 滨州市| 崇信县| 寿宁县| 石狮市| 牙克石市| 定远县| 韩城市| 宁陕县| 顺义区| 河源市| 池州市| 福清市| 历史| 祁阳县| 宁海县| 庆云县| 交口县| 彭州市| 东兴市| 宁陕县| 肃宁县| 左云县| 达拉特旗| 丰台区| 阜南县| 平利县| 灵台县| 孝昌县| 平陆县| 安吉县| 梁山县| 临邑县| 白水县| 饶阳县| 桓台县| 寿宁县| 通城县| 马山县| 崇阳县| 瓦房店市| 岱山县| 师宗县| 聂拉木县| 大英县| 拜泉县| 铜川市| 伊金霍洛旗| 尉氏县| 青铜峡市| 木兰县| 元谋县| 西充县| 元朗区| 车致| 芦山县| 灵川县| 广宗县|