男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

China has the right govt size

By John Wong (China Daily) Updated: 2011-05-14 07:25

China has the right govt size

But it needs better governance, higher public sector efficiency, and has to review central-local government economic relations

China has adopted the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015) to address its existing and emerging development challenges that include making the economic growth pattern more sustainable through economic restructuring and rebalancing. This commits the government to an active role in the country's next phase of development.

China's economy has rebounded strongly from the global financial crisis with a highly impressive 10.3 percent growth in 2010. The country has replaced Japan as the world's second largest economy, too. The Chinese government no doubt has performed well in terms of implementing economic reform and ensuring continuous development. Its past economic records speak volumes of the role it has played.

Notwithstanding this, many Chinese intellectuals and economists today are taking stock of China's previous development strategies. They are debating about what should now be the "proper role" of the government in the country's development. Has the government's participation in economic development been "optimal"? Could it be better? The ongoing debate involves a lot of "normative" (subjective) issues, and it is not easy to come up with an objective answer.

To begin with, all economies are mixed, with the government and market both being involved in their respective economic and social activities. Most people would agree that there are certain things that the state should do and can do better - and there are things that the market should do and can do better.

But there are many things that fall between these two extremes, with many people disagreeing on which activity should best belong to the state and which to the market.

In short, there is simply no such thing as an "optimal mix" of the two. Much depends on the political and social structure of a particular economy and its ideological orientation. Furthermore, the "mix" itself is not fixed but dynamic and changing over time.

Western capitalist economies used to subscribe to Adam Smith's doctrine of the "Invisible Hand" that called for minimum state intervention in the economy. Subsequently, the Great Depression of 1932 gave rise to the "Keynesian Revolution", which required the government to undertake active macroeconomic management to reduce inflation and maintain full employment.

From 1980 onward, Western governments, especially the Ronald Reagan administration in the United States and Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government in the United Kingdom, gradually shifted to the right by advocating "small government" and "bigger role for the private sector". Such is the origin of the so-called "Washington Consensus", which places paramount importance on the market. The "Chicago school of economics", with its advocacy on monetarism, efficient market hypothesis and rational expectations provided further intellectual support to this kind of thinking.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
New type of urbanization is in the details
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 安乡县| 东宁县| 襄城县| 磐安县| 澎湖县| 通榆县| 忻州市| 阳信县| 龙游县| 齐齐哈尔市| 耒阳市| 沅陵县| 利津县| 凤翔县| 三河市| 江阴市| 前郭尔| 周至县| 金昌市| 晋宁县| 屏山县| 富民县| 台山市| 孝义市| 班玛县| 遂溪县| 淄博市| 东方市| 定日县| 宝坻区| 寻乌县| 新丰县| 楚雄市| 聂荣县| 镇远县| 于都县| 宁波市| 云梦县| 顺平县| 江陵县| 侯马市| 平舆县| 花莲县| 屯留县| 肇庆市| 台东市| 崇明县| 喜德县| 梨树县| 翼城县| 塔城市| 贵州省| 呼玛县| 雷波县| 蕲春县| 中牟县| 旌德县| 庆城县| 德庆县| 额尔古纳市| 芦山县| 武平县| 林芝县| 伊春市| 莱芜市| 广宁县| 太康县| 龙海市| 霞浦县| 昌平区| 贵阳市| 江口县| 磐石市| 磐石市| 保靖县| 辽源市| 莲花县| 扶风县| 永宁县| 连云港市| 兴文县| 清苑县|