男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Editorials

Food safety and reporters

(China Daily)
Updated: 2011-06-16 07:54
Large Medium Small

At a sideline forum about food additives during the National Food Safety Publicity Week initiated on Monday, the official in charge under the Ministry of Health said that journalists whose inaccurate or distorted reporting of food safety problems mislead the public might be blacklisted.

Related readings:
Food safety and reporters Should the Ministry of Health blacklist journalists?
Food safety and reporters China beefs up food safety control in rural areas
Food safety and reporters Bad intentions threaten food safety
Food safety and reporters China launches week-long campaign to publicize food safety knowledge

The current food safety publicity week is meant to raise the general public's awareness about food safety so they will be clear-headed enough to avoid eating contaminated food or being misled by distorted reporting.

True, inaccurate or even distorted reporting of a particular event related to food safety may cause public panic or cause economic losses to the producer of a particular food or food-related products. Yet, the question remains whether it is necessary or legitimate to blacklist journalists.

If a journalist can be confirmed to have intentionally fabricated a report or deliberately distorted the facts, which then results in public panic or economic losses to a particular enterprise, the reporter concerned should be punished according to the law. There is no need to blacklist them.

To be frank, journalists have made a greater contribution to efforts to improve food safety and expose food scandals, such as melamine-contaminated milk and banned substances added to various foods, than the safety watchdogs that are supposed to oversee the nation's food chain.

A report of a study about investigative reporters by researchers from Hong Kong City University and Fudan University found that although there may be a few reporters who deliberately exaggerate their reports, the majority of investigative reporters are serious about their job and believe what they are doing is conducive to the well being of both the society and country.

Instead of pointing the finger at the minority of irresponsible journalists who produce inaccurate or distorted reporting, we should be protecting the majority of investigative reporters who have been sparing no efforts to probe and uncover illegal activities including the manufacturing of unsafe food.

When a great deal more still needs to be done to make watchdogs such as food safety testers, industrial and commercial administrative officers and food inspection and quarantine officers an effective mechanism to stop unsafe food from entering the market, reporters and even ordinary residents should be encouraged to report on any unsafe food activities they discover.

The National Food Safety Publicity Week is expected to be an annual activity, according to Food Safety Office of the State Council, but if it is truly meant to promote food safety, the role of reporters in probing food scandals should be highlighted in the campaign so they will get the support they are entitled to in their work.

(China Daily 06/16/2011 page8)

分享按鈕
主站蜘蛛池模板: 抚宁县| 芦山县| 山阳县| 左权县| 连山| 临武县| 潞城市| 三门县| 济源市| 咸阳市| 宁强县| 江达县| 遂溪县| 通河县| 博湖县| 响水县| 昆明市| 江永县| 孝义市| 太康县| 临清市| 隆安县| 玛纳斯县| 三河市| 霍州市| 文化| 岫岩| 竹山县| 正镶白旗| 东宁县| 广州市| 新乐市| 东乡| 铜鼓县| 平远县| 延长县| 东方市| 昌吉市| 岳普湖县| 阿拉善盟| 潞城市| 龙井市| 读书| 寻甸| 安阳县| 济阳县| 尼木县| 方山县| 广安市| 桃园县| 嘉禾县| 乌什县| 建昌县| 罗源县| 五河县| 龙游县| 石景山区| 富川| 登封市| 江津市| 定远县| 沁水县| 紫阳县| 如东县| 葵青区| 怀宁县| 渑池县| 西贡区| 建昌县| 马公市| 安丘市| 甘孜县| 前郭尔| 长治县| 顺昌县| 南丹县| 福州市| 平潭县| 北流市| 会东县| 凌云县| 芒康县|