男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Global employment challenge

By Michael Spence (China Daily) Updated: 2011-10-19 07:55

Both advanced and developing economies need to adjust to structural changes in world economy to ensure social stability

Over the past three decades, hundreds of millions of new workers have entered the global economy. This has brought a tremendous, and ongoing, growth in income levels, opportunities and the size of the global economy, but also more employment competition and significant shifts in relative wages and prices, which is having profound distributional effects.

These massive structural changes in the global economy present three great employment challenges worldwide, with different countries facing their own variants.

The first challenge is to generate enough jobs to accommodate the inflow of new entrants into the labor market, who have various levels of education and skill. Clearly, many advanced and developing countries are failing to do so. Youth unemployment is high and rising. Even in fast-growth developing countries, surplus labor is awaiting inclusion in the economy, and the pressure is on to sustain job creation.

The second challenge is to match skills and capabilities to the supply of jobs - an adjustment that takes time. It is also a moving target. Globalization and major labor-saving technologies have thrown labor markets in many countries into disequilibrium. Skills mismatches abound. Moreover, with continuing rapid growth in developing countries, the global economy's structure is far from static.

The third challenge is distributional. As global trade expands, competition for economic activity and jobs broadens. That affects the price of labor and the range of employment opportunities within globally integrated economies. Subsets of the population gain, and others lose, certainly relative to expectations - and often absolutely.

Many advanced countries, in fact, the majority of them, have experienced limited middle-income growth. In some European countries, where income inequality has remained in check, this has been part of a deliberate strategy to maintain employment growth and competitiveness in the tradable part of the economy, with wage restraint partly shared across the income distribution. In the United States, income inequality has risen as the upper end of the income and education spectrum benefits from globalization, while the rest experience declining employment opportunities in the tradable sector.

For two decades prior to the 2008 crisis, employment levels were maintained - and downward pressure on incomes mitigated - by creating jobs in non-tradable sectors. In some cases, this took the form of rapid growth in government; in others, like the US, a pattern of excessive, debt-fueled consumption underpinned a large shift in employment to the service industry and construction. Indeed, government and healthcare accounted for almost 40 percent of net employment growth in the US between 1990 and 2008.

That pattern came to a sudden stop with the financial crisis of 2008. Private-sector leverage declined and public-sector leverage reached - and exceeded - sustainable limits.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
New type of urbanization is in the details
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 沧州市| 剑河县| 海门市| 乳源| 阿城市| 历史| 封开县| 梅河口市| 南涧| 潜山县| 历史| 宝坻区| 彭州市| 云龙县| 泰兴市| 苍溪县| 蕉岭县| 江都市| 温州市| 武宁县| 松阳县| 温泉县| 昭苏县| 威远县| 余干县| 崇文区| 鹤山市| 漳平市| 靖边县| 望江县| 高雄县| 临海市| 南江县| 和田县| 五家渠市| 星子县| 漳平市| 巩义市| 延津县| 曲阜市| 绍兴市| 宝应县| 德兴市| 盐山县| 新津县| 塔河县| 紫阳县| 宣威市| 金溪县| 金沙县| 顺义区| 灌阳县| 马公市| 忻州市| 通州市| 昌邑市| 龙口市| 耒阳市| 隆昌县| 东兴市| 永宁县| 丽江市| 什邡市| 赣州市| 光泽县| 承德市| 余庆县| 温州市| 台中县| 安龙县| 苏尼特左旗| 永清县| 福建省| 吉隆县| 太谷县| 林口县| 罗源县| 波密县| 石林| 青海省| 阿图什市| 富顺县|