男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Rights fight part of business

By David Llewelyn (China Daily) Updated: 2012-03-01 08:04

Apple's problems in the Chinese mainland over the use of the iPad trademark and retired NBA star Michael Jordan's legal action against Qiaodan Sports over its use of the Chinese equivalent of his name - Qiaodan - are just two examples of the growing importance of intellectual property rights as commercial assets.

Legal claims and counterclaims over intellectual property rights have become part of doing business not just in China, but in many other countries as well. So has using litigation, and the threat of litigation, as a commercial weapon.

Apple's iPad difficulties are not really about whether it has infringed a trademark or not. This is not a case of a local Chinese company "stealing" a foreigner's intellectual property, the issue is who owns the trademark. Before launching its hugely successful iPad tablet in China, Apple was aware that someone else had registered IPAD trademarks in China and other countries. So, very sensibly, it decided to try and buy them. In fact, the trademark was registered by Proview long before Apple launched the iPad in the United States, indeed long before anybody even knew Apple's popular tablet would be called an iPad. Proview and National Semiconductor even held a press conference to announce their IPAD product in 2000, although it never materialized.

Apple claims that before the release of the original iPad in the US in January 2010, it purchased the right to the name in 10 countries and regions - including it thought, the Chinese mainland - from Taiwan-based display maker Proview Electronics Co Ltd.

Proview Technology based in Shenzhen alleges that Apple didn't buy the mainland trademark from the holder, which was the Shenzhen company, and therefore it is not entitled to use the name in the mainland. It has taken legal action against the US company in the Chinese mainland and the US.

Although a lot is still unclear, what does seem clear is that it all depends on whether the 2009 purchase agreement covered the trademarks belonging to Proview Shenzhen. If not, Apple really does have a problem.

Is there anything unusual about all this? No. In all countries, IPR legal actions are used to get money, sometimes justified sometimes not. These legal actions are sometimes based on doubtful or even false claims of ownership. But it is part of business and you just have to deal with it. No doubt Apple will sort it out, either by fighting Proview's claims through the courts, both in China and in the US, or paying to settle. Often it is more beneficial commercially to pay to get rid of an irritation, especially just after a product has been launched and is selling well, even if you think the legal claims are without merit.

Meanwhile, it is surely no coincidence that Michael Jordan's lawsuit against Qiaodan comes just as the Fujian-based sportswear company is thinking about an IPO. Who wants to invest in a business that has just been sued?

Some years ago a South African judge, in a case involving the hugely successful American TV series Dallas, observed that just as a mongrel attracts ticks, so does a successful product attract imitators. Some of these imitators are just trying to hitch a free ride on the product's success and do not break the law, others do break the law by infringing on a company's, or individual's legal rights.

The basketball stars Yao Ming and Yi Jianlian both succeeded in legal actions last year, when Chinese courts ordered unconnected commercial entities to stop using their names. Yi Jianlian won his legal action against another Fujian sports goods company, so it seems likely that Michael Jordan will win too, although it may take some time.

As always, there are lessons to be learnt from all this: First, every country is different. It is essential to get local advice - remember that the advice you get in Beijing may not apply to Fujian. Second, when venturing out of your home market, do your homework and think ahead. The more legal protection you have for your trademarks, your name, your copyrights in each country, the more likely it is you will avoid problems, or succeed in getting a court to remove them. Third, draft all your contracts very carefully, be precise and make sure there is no wriggle room. Finally, if someone is trying to sell you something, make sure they own it.

The author is a professor at School of Law, Singapore Management University.

(China Daily 03/01/2012 page9)

Most Viewed Today's Top News
New type of urbanization is in the details
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 抚州市| 寿宁县| 十堰市| 揭东县| 明星| 房山区| 吴川市| 时尚| 全椒县| 沅陵县| 湘潭县| 剑阁县| 庆阳市| 游戏| 大理市| 来凤县| 甘洛县| 上虞市| 绥滨县| 昌都县| 施秉县| 光泽县| 保亭| 博罗县| 武功县| 依兰县| 登封市| 陇南市| 和顺县| 大田县| 嘉鱼县| 安阳县| 双流县| 平武县| 鹤峰县| 海阳市| 晋中市| 高雄市| 蓬安县| 公主岭市| 宿迁市| 融水| 神农架林区| 泌阳县| 高清| 广昌县| 临夏市| 林州市| 漾濞| 崇州市| 阜康市| 荆门市| 汉沽区| 南汇区| 襄樊市| 天等县| 临沂市| 慈利县| 象山县| 会昌县| 南康市| 金坛市| 华池县| 瓮安县| 莒南县| 镇赉县| 呼玛县| 永昌县| 正阳县| 马鞍山市| 乌拉特前旗| 万年县| 房山区| 沂源县| 蕉岭县| 连州市| 阿坝| 突泉县| 鹤壁市| 通化市| 门源| 子长县|