男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / From the Press

Bank card fee cut will have little effect

(chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2012-11-28 22:08

Translated from the Beijing Times by Xiao Lixin

A notice from the People's Bank of China states that "swipe fees"for bank cards will be cut by 23 to 24 percent from Feb 25 next year. This does not only lower most banks' overall high-level charges, but also aims to stimulate consumption by cutting fees, said an article in the Beijing Times.

The current fees are already a big burden for small and medium-sized businesses that can only relieve the burden by either lowering service quality or passing the cost onto customers through price markups. The result of either choice would restrain the demands of normal consumption.

Cutting swipe fees is to reduce the heavy burden on shops and consumers and eventually stimulate consumption by China Unionpay and card issuers surrendering part of their profits, which should have been done a long time ago, if only from the perspective of profit distribution adjustment. The fee cut is not a lose-lose situation; on the contrary, the potential "dividend"may benefit all parties involved.

However, even if the cut can stimulate consumers' enthusiasm, it does not mean stimulating consumer demand. At present, the biggest "but"is in the catering and entertainment industry, which belongs to non-daily consumption for ordinary consumers. Therefore, the stimulus's guiding effect may not be as strong as expected.

To ease consumer burden, there should be larger fee cut in the daily consumption field including everyday goods and public service expenditure. But it would also mean more complex game playing and is not a mission that swipe fee cut can single-handedly accomplish. Consequently, the coming fee adjustment will not make any substantial contribution to increasing consumer demand.

There are still many obstacles caused by human factors such as excessive swipe fees in consumption. It is simpler to eradicate unreasonable fees than rely on the two structural factors of GDP growth and rational income distribution.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 织金县| 上犹县| 诸暨市| 长治县| 富阳市| 五台县| 边坝县| 方山县| 沁源县| 武城县| 沈阳市| 德钦县| 云霄县| 二连浩特市| 深圳市| 镇赉县| 抚远县| 江山市| 资溪县| 齐河县| 高清| 祁连县| 宜良县| 旌德县| 萨迦县| 天镇县| 通辽市| 南雄市| 苗栗市| 克什克腾旗| 包头市| 海门市| 内乡县| 翁源县| 万州区| 任丘市| 盱眙县| 三河市| 江川县| 兴国县| 襄汾县| 耿马| 凤城市| 旬邑县| 驻马店市| 台湾省| 云和县| 永新县| 即墨市| 成武县| 温宿县| 信丰县| 醴陵市| 平果县| 绥滨县| 沙雅县| 新野县| 二连浩特市| 绥芬河市| 穆棱市| 吴旗县| 东丽区| 岱山县| 屏山县| 铁岭市| 洪泽县| 涞水县| 阿勒泰市| 同心县| 张家界市| 洛阳市| 垦利县| 通榆县| 札达县| 淅川县| 民丰县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 廊坊市| 五常市| 南丹县| 广东省| 德钦县|