男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

(China Daily 12/13/2012 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 抚松县| 兴山县| 睢宁县| 永清县| 仪征市| 康平县| 花垣县| 张家界市| 平阴县| 交城县| 城口县| 和顺县| 巴南区| 西乌| 敖汉旗| 静安区| 通江县| 泌阳县| 湘西| 华亭县| 山东省| 眉山市| 郧西县| 左权县| 屏山县| 峡江县| 榆中县| 新晃| 嵊州市| 松江区| 封开县| 松潘县| 宝鸡市| 伊宁市| 东方市| 阿图什市| 宜州市| 乌海市| 奎屯市| 兴仁县| 新沂市| 应城市| 天柱县| 勐海县| 行唐县| 茶陵县| 台湾省| 象山县| 正安县| 娱乐| 安溪县| 渝北区| 阳新县| 兴文县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 区。| 苍梧县| 巴林右旗| 同德县| 镇远县| 阿巴嘎旗| 通河县| 工布江达县| 京山县| 通渭县| 九龙城区| 安化县| 遂宁市| 定南县| 兴化市| 辽中县| 双辽市| 云阳县| 鲜城| 青岛市| 扶风县| 龙岩市| 德化县| 洞口县| 梅河口市| 闽侯县| 青海省|