男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Human rights progress as a matter of fact

By Shen Tong | China Daily | Updated: 2013-02-16 08:12

Aside from clauses forbidding judges to accept gifts or services from interested parties or their attorneys, the amendment also highlights a new arrangement to allow small claims for debts or damages to be handled more efficiently. All these stipulations are aimed at creating a litigation system that can better protect human rights.

In 2012, China launched court and procuratorate reforms in the railways, too, which is a relatively independent domain. Other sweeping judicial reforms have also been launched, including measures to improve the commutation and parole system, strengthen the work of judicial suggestion and set up a judge's oath system, all of which will help make the country's judicial system more open. In the prosecution domain, the reforms launched are aimed at improving the open review procedure of criminal cases and the archives query mechanism on bribery, and optimizing the risks prevention system for clean governance.

Reforms in the field of justice administration were also launched in 2012, and they ranged from promulgation of regulations on administrative detention and setting up of criminal records to measures to improve the community-based correction system and reform the controversial labor education system.

China published a white paper on its judicial reform in October 2012, reviewing its judicial system and reform process and expounding efforts to maintain social fairness and justice and protect human rights. On protecting human rights, the white paper generalizes the effective measures China's judicial bodies have been taking to deter and prohibit extraction of confessions through torture, better protect the rights of criminal suspects and defendants, and protect attorneys' right to exercise their duties.

Apart from stating China's approach of controlling and prudently applying the death penalty, the white paper also stipulates that measures should be taken to improve the State compensation system and set up a mechanism to offer assistance to victims of crimes.

No country can claim to have the best human rights conditions. And just like other countries, China too has to improve its judicial system. But foreign organizations and think tanks should not ignore the remarkable progress China has already made in judicial reforms and human rights protection.

The deliberate distortion of China's human rights record by Human Rights Watch to give the country a bad name will ultimately boomerang on the New York-based organization.

The author is a researcher at the School of Laws in Tianjin-based Nankai University.

(China Daily 02/16/2013 page5)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 怀集县| 井陉县| 潞西市| 南京市| 吉首市| 五河县| 青州市| 青浦区| 肥乡县| 长沙县| 江西省| 江口县| 扎兰屯市| 扎囊县| 五家渠市| 沛县| 闽清县| 丹阳市| 凤城市| 呼伦贝尔市| 旺苍县| 曲沃县| 东城区| 花莲市| 梧州市| 阳信县| 吉林省| 公安县| 海原县| 五台县| 永康市| 乐东| 隆子县| 开远市| 丰原市| 修文县| 彩票| 安顺市| 辰溪县| 来安县| 富裕县| 安塞县| 灵宝市| 内乡县| 原平市| 德安县| 合川市| 贡觉县| 象州县| 四平市| 平顺县| 巴林右旗| 包头市| 民丰县| 巢湖市| 绥芬河市| 图木舒克市| 邳州市| 藁城市| 平远县| 武宁县| 陕西省| 贵南县| 湖州市| 永川市| 磴口县| 黄浦区| 红原县| 台东市| 旬邑县| 石阡县| 泰和县| 昌邑市| 洛浦县| 勐海县| 永和县| 宽甸| 高安市| 客服| 安国市| 高青县| 宜城市|