男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

No first use of nuclear weapons

By Yao Yunzhu | China Daily | Updated: 2013-04-25 08:13

In addition, former president Hu Jintao reaffirmed the policy of no first use at the nuclear security summit in Seoul in March last year. It has been reiterated in all necessary policy documents and official statements since. There is no sign that China has changed or is going to change a policy it has wisely adopted and persistently upheld for half a century.

However, speculation about a possible change to the policy of no first use has not emerged without reason. Calls for a change to the policy pledge are repeatedly heard in the Chinese media, including social media such as micro blogs, these stem from two basic understandings:

First, in the likelihood of confrontation, the ballistic missile defense systems that the United States and its allies have deployed, or are planning to deploy, would be capable of intercepting retaliatory Chinese nuclear weapons launched after it has already been attacked, thus potentially negating the effectiveness of China's nuclear arsenal as a deterrent.

Second, the US is developing its conventional strategic strike capabilities. Once deployed, they could have the capability to strike China's nuclear arsenal in the case of conflict and make redundant China's policy of no first use.

So far, no nuclear states have made it official policy to strike with strategic conventional capabilities against the nuclear weapons of another state, although such capabilities are being developed for the declared purpose of neutralizing the capabilities of nuclear proliferators. So the Cold War position of only using nuclear weapons against nuclear weapons still seems valid.

However, the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law by US President Barack Obama on Jan 2, requests a report from the Commander of US Strategic Command by Aug 15 on alleged Chinese underground tunnel networks and to review the US capability to neutralize such networks with "conventional and nuclear forces". It seems to imply that a conventional strike against Chinese nuclear weapon systems is an option.

For nearly half a century, China's pledge of no first use has served as the cornerstone of its policy on nuclear weapons. China and the rest of the world should uphold the policy of no first use, rather than discredit such a commitment.

A constructive approach would be to ensure the policy through nuclear policy dialogues, establishing a multilateral agreement on no first use among all the nuclear weapon states, and to consider limiting or even prohibiting the use of nuclear weapons in a legally binding international agreement.

The author is director of the China-America Defense Relations at the Academy of Military Science. www.chinausfocus.com

(China Daily 04/25/2013 page8)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 灵台县| 定陶县| 尉氏县| 沾化县| 长宁区| 沅陵县| 扬中市| 丰城市| 崇仁县| 建瓯市| 巴林左旗| 绥化市| 东城区| 汤原县| 邢台县| 同心县| 两当县| 广平县| 恩平市| 江山市| 鲁甸县| 原阳县| 惠东县| 萨嘎县| 阜南县| 高阳县| 句容市| 澄江县| 禹城市| 鄂托克旗| 洛川县| 定襄县| 仁化县| 平潭县| 大理市| 壶关县| 车险| 乐亭县| 察哈| 江门市| 平武县| 金坛市| 彰化市| 安徽省| 如东县| 华池县| 阿图什市| 七台河市| 沭阳县| 鱼台县| 奉化市| 大宁县| 墨玉县| 河北省| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 大渡口区| 海原县| 苍梧县| 凤台县| 九台市| 崇文区| 宜兴市| 白玉县| 麻江县| 孟州市| 台中市| 抚远县| 龙游县| 长沙市| 榕江县| 武隆县| 射阳县| 建宁县| 宁南县| 鄂州市| 铜陵市| 江达县| 义乌市| 三台县| 瑞丽市| 皋兰县| 华安县|