男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Govt must keep public buses safe

By Ma Liang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-15 07:43

Also, regular fire drills should be organized to train passengers how to break through emergency exits and get out of a bus that has caught fire, which can greatly reduce the loss of lives.

Compared with the bus fires in Guiyang (6 deaths and 35 injuries in 2014), Xiamen, Fujian province (47 deaths and 34 injuries in 2013) and Chengdu, Sichuan province, (27 deaths and 74 injuries in 2009), the Hangzhou incident was handled much more successfully largely because of the prompt actions taken by the driver and passengers. Witnesses and firefighters, too, played a vital role in minimizing the damage.

The government, however, should order a thorough investigation into the Hangzhou bus fire and use its results to suitably adjust its future rules for public transport safety. For instance, after a bus fire in Texas killed 24 people in 2005, the US National Transportation Safety Board held a public hearing the next year to find out how best it could prevent such incidents.

Over the past two decades, public bus services in many cities have been privatized to reduce losses. But private transport operators, whose sole motive is to make maximum profits, usually ignore bus safety regulations. Due to the volatility of franchise contracts, operators have little incentive to invest in the industry (that is, purchase new buses and install expensive safety mechanisms).

Since public buses are generally overcrowded, it is difficult to evacuate passengers in emergencies such as a fire. The results of privatizing public transport systems, especially bus services, around the world are mixed and inconclusive. So local urban authorities should pay greater attention to public good before privatizing transport systems.

As a country in transition, China faces many challenges and threats, including those from terrorists. Social inequity is believed to be one of the primary sources of social problems. Vulnerable people deprived of social welfare benefits are more liable to desperation, and in their frenzy they could even torch buses. Therefore, the government should take measures to reduce social inequality and ensure that everyone gets to share the benefits of the country's economic development, because that will reduce social risks. Also, a safety net should be built to help disadvantaged social groups and prevent them from taking desperate actions that endanger innocent people's lives.

The author is a research fellow at Nanyang Centre for Public Administration, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 新津县| 定边县| 景宁| 邛崃市| 溆浦县| 长葛市| 南宁市| 马山县| 炎陵县| 武乡县| 岐山县| 泸州市| 冀州市| 丹棱县| 瓮安县| 北安市| 遂川县| 广平县| 济宁市| 汝阳县| 遵义县| 忻城县| 高安市| 舟山市| 延安市| 井冈山市| 体育| 武义县| 呈贡县| 基隆市| 卢龙县| 扎兰屯市| 台州市| 宁都县| 永丰县| 中方县| 樟树市| 诏安县| 曲麻莱县| 神木县| 余干县| 丹寨县| 郓城县| 白城市| 连平县| 文登市| 惠东县| 昔阳县| 海安县| 和顺县| 乐昌市| 清丰县| 宜章县| 宁德市| 凤庆县| 武城县| 安平县| 会同县| 临朐县| 东光县| 隆德县| 军事| 龙游县| 桦川县| 平昌县| 平南县| 江孜县| 常山县| 黔西| 离岛区| 莱阳市| 伊宁县| 咸阳市| 随州市| 邵武市| 宕昌县| 泰和县| 灯塔市| 云安县| 周至县| 卢龙县| 巴里|