男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Fare hike a billion yuan question

By Zhang Haitao (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-21 07:36

Fare hike a billion yuan question

Throughout the world, transport fares are the concern of not only transport operators, but also commuters. A fare policy determines the amount of subsidies a public transport agency needs to cover its operation costs. It also determines which modes of transport people use and how many cars are on the streets.

This means a new fare policy in Beijing could drastically change the ways the surface and underground transport systems functions. So why do authorities want to increase transport fares?

Beijing subway yields relatively low revenue because of the flat fare of 2 yuan ($0.32) for one trip (which could extend from 500 meters to 88 kilometers - not including the airport line), creating a fiscal burden on the subway operators. It also affects the efficient allocation of resources, because without charging the appropriate fees for a service it is difficult to determine its true demand and, hence, the areas in which it needs improvements.

Across the world, the prevalent trend is to tap the revenue potential in the transport sector and thus not to keep fares low. For example, the London tube charges £4.50 ($7.7) for one trip within zone 1 (£2.10 for Oyster card holders). Similarly, in Hong Kong, the MTR charges between HK$4 ($0.51) and $46 a trip.

Fare pricing plays an important role in rationalizing passengers' behavior, particularly their choice between subways and buses. Given the 2-yuan fare in Beijing, some subway lines have to cope with passenger flows that exceed the capacity by up to 144 percent during peak hours, almost comparable to 171 percent in Japan - the world's most congested subway system. In contrast, Beijing's buses still have a supply surplus; according to rough estimates the existing fleet of buses could serve an additional 4 million passengers a day.

A reasonable fare structure, therefore, could prompt some price-sensitive commuters to use buses, or change their commuting timings or destinations, and thus ease the pressure on the metro.

But any increase in subway fares has to be justified in terms of social equity and benefits. An increase in fares would create social equity concerns, because mostly low-income people rely on public transport to commute to and from work. Besides, high subway fares could encourage more people to use cars, leading to more congestion and air pollution.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 泉州市| 平阳县| 阿克| 漠河县| 萨迦县| 德州市| 马山县| 习水县| 吉木萨尔县| 城固县| 永丰县| 北京市| 永胜县| 太和县| 道孚县| 大名县| 杭锦旗| 忻城县| 荥经县| 清苑县| 岱山县| 方山县| 青龙| 兴义市| 郧西县| 灵寿县| 广宁县| 偏关县| 江孜县| 平武县| 丰原市| 侯马市| 句容市| 桐城市| 平遥县| 治多县| 应城市| 咸阳市| 西和县| 梓潼县| 茂名市| 安达市| 延川县| 阜城县| 郸城县| 全州县| 穆棱市| 东安县| 衡阳县| 荆州市| 溆浦县| 宜丰县| 西华县| 浦城县| 黄浦区| 孝义市| 齐河县| 辽宁省| 平江县| 锡林浩特市| 疏勒县| 成武县| 保德县| 九江市| 石景山区| 天祝| 中超| 正蓝旗| 彭州市| 延边| 康乐县| 汶川县| 军事| 新建县| 怀柔区| 溧阳市| 南华县| 且末县| 无极县| 鹤岗市| 兴业县| 两当县|