男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

It's a matter of privilege

By Mao Shoulong (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-28 20:37

But the public sees this subsidy as another salary rise for civil servants, because employees in other industries don't have such vehicle subsidies. Ordinary people have to pay for the purchase and maintenance of their car themselves. Generally speaking, any commuter has to pay for his or her own transport expenses. If there's a business need for transportation, government vehicles should be arranged according to work requirements rather than rank. Any transportation subsidy distributed according to administrative rank is regarded as a privileged subsidy. For the public, it's unreasonable to raise civil servants' salaries in this way.

Therefore, it is still a compromised solution between the government and the public. The government wants to control the increase in expenditure on government vehicles while the public wants to eliminate the privilege they believe government employees enjoy. It's impossible for the government to completely eliminate government vehicles, because they are necessary for work. But experience has shown that only providing government vehicles for work instead of providing subsidies to officials will fail to curb the out-of-control situation regarding the quantity and use of government vehicles.

Therefore, the internal problem remains unsolved in government vehicle reform: The public wants the privilege of government vehicles according to administrative rank completely eliminated and the use of government vehicles determined by work requirements, but the authorities are unable to both abolish privilege and control the amount and use of government vehicles.

The public is intolerant of government's compromised choice, while the solution that the public supports is unacceptable to the government. Thus the authorities can only compromise and lower the transport subsidies.

Therefore, the current reform plan is a compromise between the ideal and reality. To fundamentally solve the problem, the authorities should arrange government vehicles based on work demands rather than on rank. And to control the use of government vehicles, we should focus more on the decision-making, implementation and supervision system and mechanism of public fiscal expenditure, in other words, curb the power. If we can't curb the power and achieve modernization of the national governance system, we cannot get rid of the current system of providing subsidies according to rank.

The author is a professor of public administration at Renmin University of China.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 平泉县| 晋城| 将乐县| 瑞昌市| 星子县| 永顺县| 宜宾市| 麻城市| 东阳市| 屏东市| 黄陵县| 舒城县| 临澧县| 枣强县| 修文县| 通道| 疏附县| 合川市| 宁陕县| 萍乡市| 宝清县| 阿合奇县| 庆元县| 扎兰屯市| 洮南市| 元朗区| 潍坊市| 大关县| 鄯善县| 张家口市| 韶山市| 邛崃市| 威海市| 丰城市| 泸西县| 丰都县| 阳西县| 江都市| 阜平县| 辽宁省| 天津市| 万年县| 泌阳县| 沙坪坝区| 绥阳县| 无棣县| 顺昌县| 弋阳县| 新河县| 封开县| 泗洪县| 子洲县| 济南市| 泰和县| 且末县| 靖江市| 乐至县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 南溪县| 广德县| 芜湖县| 尉氏县| 镇安县| 克拉玛依市| 庆元县| 边坝县| 商城县| 交城县| 清新县| 额济纳旗| 乾安县| 永定县| 泽库县| 榆林市| 彩票| 新绛县| 遵化市| 九台市| 大邑县| 渝北区| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 临澧县|