男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

How to supervise the anti-graft watchdogs

By Zhang Lin | China Daily | Updated: 2017-01-13 07:51

How to supervise the anti-graft watchdogs

A gavel in a court. [Photo/IC]

As an important part of the Communist Party of China's campaign for stricter self-governance, the Party's disciplinary officials, or anti-graft watchdogs, undertake the mission of "supervision, discipline enforcement and holding violators accountable", and thus play a decisive role in the Party's fight against corruption and drive toward clean governance.

But supervision of the anti-graft watchdogs has long been a difficult issue.

At the just-concluded annual plenary meeting of the top anti-graft watchdog-the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China-Party chief Xi Jinping said disciplinary commissions at various levels should strengthen self-supervision and voluntarily put themselves under intra-Party supervision and social supervision, as part of the efforts to build a team of disciplinary officials that can win the confidence of the Party and the people. Xi's remarks should resolve the anti-graft watchdog supervision issue.

All disciplinary officials have to strengthen self-supervision, in order to build a first and critical line of defense against corruption and decadence. A team of trustworthy disciplinary officials cannot be built by relying on external supervision alone; stricter self-supervision and "supervision of supervisors" are also needed for that.

The building of such a team requires anti-graft watchdogs to continuously educate themselves about disciplinary rules, raise their awareness of the rule of law and learn to handle all cases in strict accordance to the law. Also required is stricter supervision of discipline enforcement by anti-graft watchdogs at the central, provincial and municipal levels.

Moreover, continuous efforts must be made to promote organizational and institutional innovations in the field of discipline inspection, and to deepen the discipline inspection system reform to ensure that the power of supervising discipline enforcement is used in a standardized and orderly manner.

Anti-graft watchdogs must put themselves under intra-Party supervision-which means supervision of various levels of leading Party organs and officials by various Party organizations and the massive number of Party members.

To help build a trustworthy team of anti-graft watchdogs, every disciplinary official must also take part in the Party's organizational meetings and collective activities organized by the Party branch or group he/she belongs to, and voluntarily put himself/herself under its supervision. The weapon of criticism and self-criticism must be well utilized to make all disciplinary officials realize their problems and strictly adhere to the rules. And the work of discipline inspection commissions must be regularly published in the form of bulletins, notifications and reports, and public opinion polls regularly conducted to assess their work in a timely manner.

Disciplinary officials should also put themselves under social supervision, that is, under the supervision of the people and social organizations, because aside from stricter self-supervision and intra-Party supervision, social supervision is also needed to build a team of trustworthy disciplinary officials. For example, hotline mailboxes can be set up for informants to expand the channels for whistle-blowers to reveal the names of disciplinary officials suspected of violating the law and Party discipline.

Besides, different types of activities can be organized with participants from different walks of life to solicit the opinions of people's political consultative conferences, democratic parties and social groups on disciplinary officials' work. The anti-graft watchdogs must also raise their capability of dealing with the media and publicize their discipline inspection work through media outlets to subject their work to journalists' scrutiny and better regulate discipline enforcement activities.

Hopefully, discipline watchdogs at different levels will better combine self-supervision, intra-Party supervision and social supervision and help build a team of disciplinary officials that can win the trust of the Party and the people.

The author is an assistant research fellow on political civilization studies at Beijing Union University.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 吉安市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 堆龙德庆县| 扎囊县| 凤庆县| 湟中县| 盘锦市| 西青区| 景泰县| 嵩明县| 邢台市| 望谟县| 丰县| 江安县| 邢台县| 水城县| 奇台县| 贵定县| 文水县| 高阳县| 墨竹工卡县| 德格县| 育儿| 霍邱县| 皋兰县| 河北区| 潍坊市| 子长县| 宁强县| 得荣县| 黑水县| 岗巴县| 万源市| 龙川县| 乐陵市| 东阿县| 河西区| 同德县| 漳平市| 和顺县| 威远县| 锦州市| 巴南区| 武清区| 九台市| 河东区| 西宁市| 久治县| 黄大仙区| 伊宁市| 房产| 贺州市| 双江| 南城县| 华安县| 三门县| 墨脱县| 望都县| 得荣县| 亚东县| 白沙| 玛纳斯县| 泸定县| 玛纳斯县| 贡山| 教育| 青川县| 邵阳县| 红安县| 当阳市| 义乌市| 陇川县| 平顶山市| 和林格尔县| 车险| 宁乡县| 龙州县| 津南区| 昔阳县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 宜黄县| 梁河县|