男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Not cold hearted, just less tolerance for rule-breakers

By Zhang Zhouxiang | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:28

Not cold hearted, just less tolerance for rule-breakers

LI MIN/CHINA DAILY

On Sunday, the second day of Spring Festival, a man was killed after he fell into the tiger enclosure while trying to get into the zoo in Ningbo, East China's Zhejiang province, without paying for a ticket.

The tragedy cost two lives, as the tiger was shot dead when zoo employees tried to rescue the man.

Video posted online shows a tiger mauling the man as visitors scream in horror at the Youngor Wildlife Park. Two other tigers stand nearby watching. Later reports say police shot the tiger that attacked the man while staff at the wildlife park drove the other tigers away using firecrackers and water cannon.

As news of the incident spread, the majority of voices online blamed the dead man for the animal's death. On Sina Weibo, China's equivalent of Twitter, there even emerged hashtags such as #Condolences to the innocent tiger or #Sympathy with the victim tiger.

Some said this was a sign that people are becoming more cold-hearted. But they are wrong. People have been displaying increasingly more enthusiasm for helping those in need and participating in charity work. In 2016, the China Charity Federation received donations of 18.8 billion yuan ($2.7 billion) in total, 46 percent more than the donations received in 2015, and they sent helping hands to one tragedy after another.

People are just tired of forgiving those in the wrong. While the sentiment is right, it has been abused too much. When somebody commits a crime, no matter how cruel the crime is, media outlets depict the culprit's miserable childhood and there are calls for forgiveness. When someone smokes in public, there are always people calling for tolerance.

People are fed up and angry with lawbreakers escaping their due punishments in the name of forgiveness and tolerance.

But going back to the tragedy at the wildlife park in Ningbo, the tiger's death shows the park was not well prepared for such emergencies. They did not have any tranquilizer guns that could sedate the tiger immediately and save the lives of both the man and the endangered animal.

When a young bear escaped from a zoo in Ohio last year, posing a threat to tourists' safety, the authorities responded immediately and used a tranquilizer gun to capture it. Such tranquilizer guns should become standard equipment in China at all zoos and safari parks that are home to wild animals.

And, on another level, perhaps it is time to reflect on whether zoos and wildlife parks have had their day. As Jason Baker, vice-president of international campaigns for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, noted in a statement after the incident in Ningbo: "Attacks by captive big cats on people-which occur with staggering regularity-illustrate the profound level of stress, anxiety and agitation these animals experience every day of their lives."

In the meantime, it is necessary to raise people's awareness that the animals in zoos and wildlife parks are not domesticated pets, and of the need for visitors to observe rules for their own safety.

The incident in Ningbo came only six months after one woman was killed and another was mauled by tigers after they got out of their car while visiting Badaling Wildlife World in Beijing.

And just hours after the tragedy in Ningbo, some other tourists still tried to avoid paying for tickets by climbing over the wall. A camera even recorded how they quarreled with the zoo staff who tried to stop them.

It seems the sense that the rules might be there for their benefit is still illusive among some people. Although the odds of being attacked by a tiger are rather slim, they increase remarkably if one ignores the rules protecting one from the threat.

The man in the Ningbo incident paid for his fault with his life, but the tiger was killed for his fault, too.

The author is a writer with China Daily. zhangzhouxiang@chinadaily.com.cn

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乐都县| 安龙县| 莱芜市| 紫阳县| 营山县| 土默特左旗| 崇文区| 定南县| 湘阴县| 永胜县| 土默特左旗| 石阡县| 张家界市| 济阳县| 晴隆县| 河津市| 银川市| 鹤峰县| 尼勒克县| 夏河县| 曲靖市| 吉木萨尔县| 武强县| 四子王旗| 万全县| 江孜县| 思南县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 文成县| 双鸭山市| 大理市| 通化市| 龙江县| 辰溪县| 额济纳旗| 高邑县| 岑溪市| 新余市| 宁明县| 韶关市| 如东县| 根河市| 托里县| 广宁县| 庆阳市| 宝兴县| 庆安县| 汉中市| 开鲁县| 许昌县| 留坝县| 土默特右旗| 东平县| 广安市| 邹城市| 东丽区| 彝良县| 治县。| 乌拉特后旗| 四子王旗| 玉溪市| 汉阴县| 博野县| 宁国市| 丽江市| 克拉玛依市| 松阳县| 南漳县| 通化市| 长海县| 松江区| 鄯善县| 凭祥市| 乳山市| 桐城市| 台东县| 滨州市| 广宗县| 札达县| 贡觉县| 马鞍山市| 雅江县|