男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Judges cannot be both referees and players

China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-16 07:54

Judges cannot be both referees and players

A file photo of China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC). [Photo: Xinhua]

Officials of the local court and procuratorate?in Lulong county, North China's Hebei province, attended a recent training session on attracting investments to boost the local economy that was sponsored by the local government, less than a week after the Supreme People's Court officially prohibited their involvement in attracting investment. Beijing Youth Daily commented on Wednesday:

The Lulong government defended the training session as necessary so the judges would be better able to mediate cases, but the judicial officials' presence at a training session aimed at attracting investment is questionable.

It has to be made clear that administrative matters, ranging from attracting investment to urban relocation programs that often involve the demolition of resident's homes, are the concern of local governments and it is the judicial departments' job to make sure the cases brought to trial are fairly and properly dealt with.

Getting them involved in the implementation of executive orders could, on the one hand, mean they do not stay within the boundaries and obligations of judicial power. While on the other hand, giving judges assignments beyond their duties could overburden them at the cost of efficiency. That miscarriages of justice have been belatedly rectified in some cases is a case in point.

Judges have the duty to safeguard social justice and settle legal disputes. Attracting investments to boost the local economy in most cases features intertwined interests concerning local governments and non-local investors, as well as the demolition of old buildings and the construction of new ones.

They should not be introduced as advisors and mediators to attract investments. There could be a risk of premature judicial intervention if the local officials insist that judges come to their aid whenever disputes occur.

That being the case, people have good reasons to question the local court's role if it is both a player and a referee at the same time. It is important that judicial organs are not misused as an affiliation of the government.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 沅陵县| 习水县| 驻马店市| 蓬安县| 乌拉特后旗| 青海省| 新竹市| 积石山| 洪洞县| 兰州市| 长治县| 阳原县| 绵阳市| 香格里拉县| 甘肃省| 崇左市| 新河县| 中西区| 商南县| 彭山县| 历史| 宜都市| 平遥县| 仙游县| 巫山县| 法库县| 西华县| 湟源县| 海原县| 无极县| 东兰县| 沧源| 政和县| 故城县| 吉木萨尔县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 始兴县| 双流县| 武清区| 正宁县| 北碚区| 和田县| 大同市| 资阳市| 沽源县| 神池县| 韶山市| 江城| 曲周县| 宁武县| 福清市| 玉田县| 依安县| 台东市| 安宁市| 镇平县| 临沭县| 通州市| 盐池县| 竹山县| 紫阳县| 天镇县| 盱眙县| 胶南市| 金湖县| 海兴县| 金湖县| 北辰区| 津市市| 乐至县| 邵阳市| 内丘县| 崇州市| 新竹县| 大悟县| 正宁县| 鄢陵县| 涿鹿县| 安宁市| 平利县| 独山县| 隆化县|