男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Rules required to regulate rising car-sharing business

China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-21 07:50

Rules required to regulate rising car-sharing business

Shouqi and Homeinns announced their strategic partnership in Beijing on Aug 11, 2016, aimed at easing tailored services for travelers, such as simplifying the process of picking up and returning hired cars. [Photo/VCG]

Car-sharing services?provided by companies such as Gofun Chuxing launched by Beijing Shouqi Group and Car2go under the automotive giant Daimler AG, are gaining popularity among young people in mega cities such as Beijing and Shanghai. Beijing News commented on Monday:

The sharing cars, mostly electric vehicles, are ready for use after the registration process has been completed, which takes just a few minutes, and they cost even less than taking a cab. Take for example Gofun, which has 1,100 cars in Beijing with more coming once its application for license plates is approved. Apart from a refundable deposit of 699 yuan ($102), one only has to spend 1 yuan per kilometer and 0.1 yuan per minute for a ride.

In comparison, traditional car-rental services charge on a daily basis-meaning that only long-distance commuters are likely to use them-and they are often expensive.

Car-sharing services, on the other hand, can be rather flexible in offering tailored driving choices and are more environment friendly. They thus have greater potential to attract enough customers to make the companies profitable.

What the local governments should do with the emerging industry is to encourage and support its growth instead of nipping it in the bud with excessive restrictions. Insufficient space for urban parking is no doubt a problem and the lack of chargers for electric vehicles is another. They cannot be solved by the car-sharing service providers alone.

That is to say car-sharing needs proper supervision. Like their bike-sharing counterparts, the car-sharing companies are struggling to keep illegal parking in check.

This requires the authorities to stipulate rules to protect the interests of both the car-sharing service providers and their users. In other words, they should learn the lesson from the previous failure to streamline the ride-hailing services, which were not put on the right track until they were legalized last year.

Sitting on the sidelines will only create gray areas where speculators prosper and decent players suffer, and placing a ban on everything is simply not possible after the country stressed the need to nurture the sharing economy.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 梁河县| 仙居县| 锡林浩特市| 容城县| 遂川县| 昌图县| 武山县| 瓮安县| 邢台县| 平谷区| 高青县| 宜丰县| 凉城县| 柞水县| 宝山区| 耒阳市| 中方县| 东明县| 浠水县| 武宁县| 姜堰市| 息烽县| 枣强县| 连江县| 山东省| 潢川县| 雷山县| 深圳市| 海南省| 南汇区| 神池县| 扶余县| 谷城县| 贺州市| 南汇区| 雅安市| 巴彦县| 奎屯市| 桑植县| 清镇市| 张家川| 柘城县| 朝阳县| 绥中县| 梅河口市| 林周县| 莱州市| 高阳县| 中卫市| 宝兴县| 南部县| 神池县| 闽侯县| 深水埗区| 库尔勒市| 万州区| 金华市| 蛟河市| 壶关县| 抚松县| 包头市| 五华县| 茶陵县| 麻城市| 眉山市| 和龙市| 喀喇| 临武县| 凌源市| 乐业县| 三都| 文山县| SHOW| 呼图壁县| 迁安市| 廊坊市| 合山市| 革吉县| 丹凤县| 都安| 凤凰县| 浦城县|