男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-01 07:57

Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

A view of Alibaba Group's headquarters in Hangzhou, East China's Zhejiang province, March 21, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua]

ON MONDAY, DOMESTIC E-COMMERCE GIANT ALIBABA announced that in 2016 it had found 4,495 instances of businesses making or selling fake goods. The judiciary investigated 1,184 of them, yet only 33 people have received sentences. Beijing News comments:

Fake goods have always been a major headache for Alibaba. Yet the number of people found guilty of making and selling fake goods is so small that people accuse the judiciary of not enforcing the law properly.

This is not the case, as the judiciary has on several occasions vowed to strike the illegal interest chain of counterfeit goods. The true cause is Alibaba has the information while the judiciary has the power, yet the two do not work well together to tackle the issue.

E-commerce platforms such as Alibaba have information on all the businesses they host. For instance, the IP address, physical address and ID number of anybody who sells goods on their platform is recorded, and Alibaba could easily locate a seller identified as retailer of fake goods. Yet Alibaba does not have the power to enforce law, so it cannot punish the fake goods sellers, nor is it the holder of the trademarks being violated so it cannot sue the fake goods sellers.

The judiciary has the power but lacks the necessary evidence to prove a case, since, when it comes to e-commerce, the judiciary's evidence requirements are not up to date with modern technologies.

The companies holding trademarks, the e-commerce platform, and the judiciary are all working to fight fake goods, but it seems they are working in different directions and they lack the necessary coordination.

This situation must be changed. The judiciary needs to upgrade its concept of evidence and learn more about modern technologies, while the e-commerce platforms need to explain their evidence in plainer words, so that the forces fighting against fake goods can more effectively unite.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 金湖县| 雅江县| 太仆寺旗| 南雄市| 宾川县| 根河市| 财经| 肇源县| 磐安县| 青河县| 连南| 岱山县| 阳城县| 八宿县| 鹿邑县| 镇赉县| 扎兰屯市| 北碚区| 西丰县| 曲松县| 皋兰县| 同德县| 柳州市| 漳浦县| 齐河县| 黄浦区| 隆昌县| 天全县| 通榆县| 涟源市| 宿松县| 赣榆县| 菏泽市| 古蔺县| 罗甸县| 城市| 牡丹江市| 沅陵县| 兴安县| 龙岩市| 丰镇市| 绵阳市| 宜都市| 精河县| 葫芦岛市| 晋江市| 炎陵县| 兴仁县| 沁阳市| 驻马店市| 古丈县| 嵊泗县| 福清市| 许昌县| 建湖县| 平凉市| 宁明县| 吴桥县| 阆中市| 叶城县| 阳西县| 河南省| 湛江市| 襄樊市| 竹北市| 吐鲁番市| 石林| 四子王旗| 阳高县| 湘西| 贵定县| 民乐县| 宜宾县| 宁国市| 密山市| 白银市| 丽水市| 嘉义县| 陇川县| 娱乐| 大丰市| 利辛县|