男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Legal protection for riders and providers

China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-22 07:47

Legal protection for riders and providers

Riders scan ofo bikes in Xi'an, Shaanxi province. The bike-hire startup is experimenting with a deposit waiver system for users in Shanghai and may extend the service to other cities in the country. [Photo/China Daily]

IN WHAT IS BELIEVED TO BE the country's first court case against a company offering a shared-bicycle service, a 31-year-old Beijing citizen is suing Ofo, one of the country's leading bike-sharing companies, as he claims that he was injured due to a faulty bike he rented two months ago, Guangzhou Daily commented on Tuesday:

The plaintiff claims that Ofo is responsible for insufficient maintenance, as he alleges the brakes on the bike he hired were faulty. He is claiming 20,000 yuan ($2,900) as compensation to cover his medical treatment, mental distress and transportation costs.

He is not the first rider to solicit compensation from bike-sharing operators in the country on the grounds that the bikes they used were not well maintained.

Albeit most claimants' requests were answered and properly dealt with by the companies concerned, a routine approach to situations like this is still missing. Accidents involving sharing bikes, which have become very popular in less than a year, will inevitably increase as more people use them. That warrants a tailored accountability mechanism when it comes to the respective responsibilities of both users and the bike-sharing service providers.

The business model of station-less bikes is designed to help urban commuters travel the "last mile" more efficiently. To protect users' legal interests, ensuring their bikes are in satisfactory condition is the least the bike providers can do.

Admittedly, big players such as Mobike and Ofo are covered by insurance and they pledge to compensate riders for any injuries incurred while using the bikes. Compensation is also available for people injured by those using the bikes.

Such efforts are praiseworthy, but not enough. They should be institutionalized and streamlined in the way insurance is compulsory for all vehicles.

Bike-sharing service providers, too, need legal protection because they are at risk of being blackmailed by unscrupulous users willing to go to great lengths to be compensated.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 三都| 大渡口区| 永胜县| 盘锦市| 夏津县| 新安县| 阳城县| 平定县| 通州区| 安国市| 肇东市| 东安县| 苍山县| 滦平县| 万载县| 通海县| 汉寿县| 雅安市| 马山县| 奉贤区| 海晏县| 平舆县| 巴林右旗| 甘德县| 兴国县| 黄骅市| 乌拉特后旗| 吉林省| 西昌市| 板桥市| 平度市| 南江县| 大丰市| 咸阳市| 东乡族自治县| 涿鹿县| 蒲江县| 乐清市| 崇阳县| 收藏| 景宁| 专栏| 西宁市| 久治县| 侯马市| 怀安县| 都匀市| 竹溪县| 长子县| 雷波县| 普定县| 隆化县| 湟中县| 郎溪县| 沐川县| 桐乡市| 海阳市| 阳山县| 探索| 化德县| 盘山县| 龙岩市| 龙泉市| 阿拉善左旗| 方山县| 甘谷县| 胶州市| 香河县| 修水县| 怀柔区| 剑川县| 黄石市| 巴楚县| 秦皇岛市| 普定县| 正定县| 静安区| 河南省| 寻乌县| 通渭县| 定西市| 平原县|