男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-06 07:06

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

More than 4,000 illegal parking bicycles impounded by authorities in Shanghai, March 1, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

LARGE NUMBERS OF TOURISTS flocked to Shenzhen Bay Park in Guangdong province on Monday using bikes they rented via bike-sharing service apps such as Mobike. There were so many cyclists that they blocked most of the bike lanes in the park and caused great inconvenience to other visitors. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Wednesday:

A glance at the congested bike lanes in Shenzhen Bay Park would be enough to give people goose bumps. During the three-day Tomb Sweeping Day travel rush that ended on Tuesday, an average of 300,000 tourists visited the park each day, many of them riding station-less sharing bikes.

The influx of enthusiastic riders made park management difficult, as randomly parked bikes turned the beach bike lane into a makeshift parking lot. That explains why after the influx of cyclists on Monday, sharing bikes were forbidden to enter the park grounds the next day.

The rise of the sharing economy has been applauded, but the side effects are beginning to emerge. The parking chaos at Shenzhen Bay Park is but one example, but it will not be the last, as more bikes hit the road and management of them struggles to keep up.

Despite the increasing popularity of the bike-hire services, service providers have to make sure their bikes do not impose a burden on social governance.

It is laudable that several bike-sharing service companies have sought to cooperate with the Shenzhen government after their bikes flooded into the park, in an attempt to make amends. And their success in keeping most riders at bay the next day means that efficient management is possible if preemptive measures are taken and notice given in advance.

On its part, the Shenzhen government should have anticipated the trouble caused by the unlimited entry of bikes into the park. Although it is making progress in managing the sharing bikes, it has a lot more to do to help sharing bikes become an integral part of urban life. Specific boundaries have to be drawn with regard to where bikes can be left by their users.

Ultimately, a consensus needs to be reached among local governments, bike-hire companies, and customers that they have a shared interest in managing the use of such bikes. Whether the bike-sharing services will thrive hinges on flexible governmental guidance, the self-discipline of users, and the bike providers' efforts to hold unruly users to account.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中牟县| 靖安县| 元阳县| 怀宁县| 大埔区| 鄂温| 永登县| 荣昌县| 额尔古纳市| 亚东县| 诸城市| 扎兰屯市| 驻马店市| 富顺县| 永宁县| 邮箱| 湟源县| 新邵县| 天峻县| 保亭| 辉县市| 怀柔区| 石家庄市| 马关县| 东阿县| 辽宁省| 兰溪市| 红原县| 抚顺市| 怀宁县| 汶川县| 钦州市| 文昌市| 镇康县| 长沙县| 渭南市| 韶关市| 泗阳县| 杂多县| 高邑县| 莱芜市| 丰原市| 望谟县| 上栗县| 久治县| 阜新| 西藏| 于田县| 赤峰市| 繁峙县| 房产| 邻水| 简阳市| 定远县| 正蓝旗| 扎兰屯市| 洛川县| 霍城县| 崇仁县| 宣汉县| 塔城市| 临澧县| 江城| 临江市| 缙云县| 昂仁县| 综艺| 荣成市| 金华市| 安阳市| 轮台县| 西畴县| 广东省| 山阳县| 吉林省| 新营市| 涟水县| 武冈市| 中宁县| 五指山市| 远安县| 简阳市|