男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 台南市| 宁蒗| 濮阳县| 礼泉县| 鄂州市| 乌拉特前旗| 北票市| 明水县| 香河县| 邻水| 和顺县| 罗山县| 林芝县| 赣榆县| 永泰县| 和田县| 聂拉木县| 绥宁县| 禹州市| 中超| 屏山县| 富川| 咸丰县| 印江| 敦化市| 伽师县| 辽阳市| 策勒县| 邵武市| 噶尔县| 额尔古纳市| 汉寿县| 丽水市| 句容市| 河东区| 栖霞市| 佳木斯市| 锡林浩特市| 黔东| 稷山县| 遂宁市| 衡南县| 高碑店市| 汝城县| 新昌县| 水城县| 宕昌县| 庄河市| 札达县| 那曲县| 宁陕县| 玛曲县| 都安| 保康县| 财经| 绍兴县| 泌阳县| 新余市| 当阳市| 嵊州市| 梧州市| 白玉县| 吉林市| 磐安县| 奎屯市| 景谷| 临湘市| 定边县| 云梦县| 晋江市| 姚安县| 宜都市| 扎兰屯市| 岗巴县| 玉溪市| 登封市| 浪卡子县| 奎屯市| 旬邑县| 广河县| 班玛县| 承德县|