男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

UK will pay price if it carries out decision to exclude Huawei: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-05-24 20:19
Share
Share - WeChat
Huawei 5G Innovation and Experience Center in London, Britain, Jan 28, 2020. [Photo/Xinhua]

Following a January decision to grant Chinese telecommunications equipment supplier Huawei a limited role in the United Kingdom's 5G networks, Downing Street is reportedly planning for the company's full phaseout from those networks by 2023.

If true, this would be a very costly policy reversal that would cause an all-lose scenario for all stakeholders, and one whose ramifications would undoubtedly ripple far beyond technological concerns.

Huawei may have dreamed of being what it is today — a leading global 5G solutions provider — and a flag-flyer for Chinese high technology. Company founder Ren Zhengfei is famous for that ambition anyway. However, in realizing that ambition, the company has become politicized beyond anyone's imagination.

Under mounting pressure from Washington, the "national security threat" argument is rapidly poisoning Huawei's international business environment. What the British government is allegedly planning comes as a further stab in the company's back following the latest US attempt to cut the company's supply lines.

The British government's January decision that excluded Huawei from supplying "core" technologies and equipment and capped its market share to 35 percent, wasn't fair at all. All the allegations against the company appear to have been built on the fears that Huawei may become a prevailing presence in Western telecommunications networks, and that China has a strong government.

Except for that, there has been no credible evidence offered whatsoever despite all the security threat clamor.

But Huawei accepted that conditional involvement — at least it wasn't complete exclusion.

What is reportedly happening now, however, is different. It means significant escalation of discriminative government interference, which almost certainly will meet retaliatory responses from Beijing.

While the UK is no doubt hoping that toeing the US line on Huawei will help it gain a favorable trade deal with the United States, with which it began negotiations this month, the benefits are likely to be offset by the losses.

Unlike working together to address misgivings regarding security, pushing a certain company out of a country's market simply because of its national identity is not only against market economy rules, but also a very unfriendly gesture against the latter's country of origin.

Since the Chinese government has attached great significance to the way Huawei is treated overseas, and literally taken it increasingly as a test stone of bilateral ties, its reaction to such a decision should be easy to predict.

Losing the UK market will no doubt be a heavy blow to Huawei. But Huawei won't be the sole loser.

Besides satisfying the China hawks in Washington and London's political offices, such a decision will deliver little benefit to the UK itself.

Kicking out Huawei equipment from British networks will considerably increase the financial burdens for service providers, delay 5G rollout in the country, hurt relations with China, darken the UK's post-Brexit economic prospects, and erode confidence in the UK's long-standing reputation as a market economy.

British telecom operators from EE to Three have aired concerns about the high cost of replacing Huawei. They are foremost victims of politicization. Along with the numerous customers waiting for the broadband access Prime Minister Boris Johnson promised.

For the governments in Beijing and London, this is ultimately a matter of trust. Once trust is gone, all the rhetoric about collaboration will sound hollow.

At a time when the world badly needs solidarity amid a devastating pandemic, a decision like this will only worsen the atmosphere for international cooperation.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 抚顺县| 秦皇岛市| 泸州市| 锦州市| 丹东市| 高青县| 南陵县| 阿图什市| 泗水县| 彩票| 梅河口市| 漾濞| 庆安县| 中江县| 陆川县| 施秉县| 吉木萨尔县| 樟树市| 集贤县| 莎车县| 密山市| 玛曲县| 东兴市| 长春市| 溆浦县| 吉木萨尔县| 新安县| 六枝特区| 武义县| 南召县| 敦煌市| 嘉峪关市| 大化| 黄龙县| 盐边县| 中西区| 星座| 涟源市| 新乡市| 本溪| 渭南市| 若尔盖县| 莱阳市| 忻州市| 天峨县| 浦东新区| 衡阳县| 昌江| 阿瓦提县| 永靖县| 霸州市| 财经| 彭山县| 兰坪| 犍为县| 大邑县| 资兴市| 额尔古纳市| 寿宁县| 惠安县| 伊金霍洛旗| 新民市| 黔江区| 吉林市| 南乐县| 扎赉特旗| 荣成市| 峨边| 德令哈市| 定边县| 额尔古纳市| 新密市| 洪湖市| 菏泽市| 漾濞| 瑞丽市| 铅山县| 讷河市| 苍溪县| 峨边| 石柱| 上杭县|