男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Beijing honors vow to ensure fairer access to vaccines

By Yao Yuxin | China Daily | Updated: 2021-03-04 07:50
Share
Share - WeChat
JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

Editor's Note: Beijing has been dispatching COVID-19 vaccines to developing countries in keeping with its promise to supply 10 million doses of Chinese-made vaccines to the global vaccine sharing initiative COVAX. Two experts share their views on China's role in ensuring equitable distribution of vaccines with China Daily's Yao Yuxin. Excerpts follow:

Vaccine distribution must be based on need

The devastating novel coronavirus pandemic and the shortage of vaccines have prompted rich countries to grab the lion's share of the vaccines given their strong purchasing power. Some of them have even placed orders for tens of millions of more vaccines than they need to inoculate their entire population.

By contrast, many low-and middle-income countries have received few or no vaccines, which, as World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, may put the world on the brink of a "catastrophic moral failure".

Driven by profits, private enterprises in some developed countries have little interest in making vaccines global public goods. Besides, vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, both US companies, need to be stored at ultra-low temperatures which many low-and middle-income countries cannot, thus creating another vaccine barrier.

On the other hand, in line with the spirit of building a community with a shared future for mankind, China, despite the majority of its population awaiting vaccination, has been supplying vaccines to other developing countries.

China joined the WHO-led COVAX in October, and since then it has taken measures to ensure equitable vaccine distribution, including supplying 10 million vaccine doses to other developing countries.

But some Western politicians have deliberately misinterpreted China's goodwill gesture as "vaccine diplomacy" to win the support of other developing countries. This is a classic example of the West playing the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" card against Beijing.

China, however, should keep doing what it believes is right regardless of the West's criticisms, not least because many developing countries have appreciated its timely help with vaccines.

The distribution of vaccines should depend on need, not on money power. And to ensure developing countries get fairer access to the vaccines, the United Nations should play the most important role in vaccine distribution.

The lack of standardization (under the International Organization for Standardization) for the vaccines made by different countries is hindering the global cooperation for the free flow of the vaccines. For example, a German diplomat in Beijing recently told me that he can neither take a Chinese vaccine nor a German vaccine, because the former isn't covered by his German health insurance company against any eventuality, and the latter is unavailable in China.

Since the novel coronavirus has already infected more than 114 million people worldwide and claimed 2.53 million lives, perhaps the WHO should grant universal licensing for effective vaccines, allowing them to enter new markets without repeatedly going through the complicated procedures of drug certification of different countries.

Given that a number of common challenges require better global collaboration to address such as climate change, the fair distribution of vaccines is a test to determine whether the world can work together to overcome global threats. The "ideology first" approach will not help the world defeat the virus. And vaccine monopoly will put everyone at risk including the rich countries, while making concerted global efforts to contain the pandemic will save lives and boost the global economy.

Wang Yiwei, a professor at the School of International Studies, Renmin University of China

China is shouldering its global responsibilities

The vaccines of Chinese drug makers Sinopharm and Sinovac meet the medical standards of China and the WHO, and have proven safe and effective at home and abroad. By enacting a vaccine management law, China has strictly supervised the whole process of vaccine production, guaranteeing the efficacy and safety of Chinese-made vaccines.

Since China largely contained the pandemic at home before other countries, the phase-three clinical trials of the Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines were conducted in some other countries as well, making it hard to unify the data flowing in from multiple places.

Yet the participation of third parties in collection and analysis of data makes the disclosure open and transparent. The fact that Chinese vaccines are safe and effective is strictly based on the results of the clinical trials.

A growing number of countries have acknowledged the efficacy of the Chinese-made vaccines. And as promised, the Chinese government is supplying 10 million vaccines to other developing countries to facilitate the equitable distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Besides, unlike the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, the Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines don't need ultra-low temperature for storage and thus can be more easily transported in developing countries.

Also, like the other major countries, China has started inoculating its population-more than 50 million people have already been vaccinated in the country. And the domestic demand for about 2 billion doses of vaccines is likely to be met by the end of 2021, thanks to China's strong production capacity and government support.

Moreover, China has been able to supply vaccines to other developing countries because of its five R&D and 18 production lines. At the R&D facilities, scientists are closely monitoring the novel coronavirus's mutations so they can replace the strains in the vaccines and put them into production within a short time, and warn the health authorities in advance about a possibly graver health crisis.

According to a paper by Gao Fu, head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, published in the preprint research site bioRxiv, the inactivated vaccine by Sinopharm-affiliated Beijing Institute of Biological Products, and recombinant dimeric RBD ZF2001 vaccine in ongoing phase-three clinical trials jointly conducted by Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products and the Chinese Academy of Sciences are effective even against the South African strain of the virus.

In the global fight against the coronavirus, China has not shied away from shouldering its responsibilities as a major country. It has made its vaccines global public goods to make them easily available to the developing world.

Feng Duojia, chairman of China Association for Vaccines

 

Wang Jiaqi contributed to the story.

The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 临汾市| 庆元县| 白朗县| 安平县| 昂仁县| 诸暨市| 汉中市| 克东县| 迭部县| 左云县| 吉水县| 尼木县| 石渠县| 清镇市| 贵定县| 泸定县| 丹棱县| 三明市| 运城市| 定日县| 新邵县| 广安市| 南通市| 钦州市| 离岛区| 安多县| 芜湖市| 榆中县| 清流县| 大英县| 车险| 嘉善县| 佛冈县| 普兰县| 井陉县| 二连浩特市| 荣昌县| 中卫市| 双桥区| 北海市| 舟山市| 青河县| 永德县| 绍兴市| 拜城县| 汤阴县| 永寿县| 芦溪县| 北京市| 左权县| 海门市| 孝昌县| 上林县| 达州市| 南宁市| 米易县| 琼中| 靖宇县| 永州市| 察雅县| 吴堡县| 和硕县| 城固县| 揭阳市| 永城市| 彭山县| 文昌市| 舞阳县| 镇坪县| 金坛市| 九寨沟县| 清新县| 保亭| 建平县| 盐山县| 海门市| 五寨县| 高雄市| 出国| 宁蒗| 庄浪县| 苍溪县|